Washington state voters rejected ballot initiative 001 (I-001) last week, the Seattle Times reports, with just over 52% of voters saying No. While most rural counties supported it, the more populous counties, like King County, where Seattle is located, rejected it.

If it had passed, the ballot question would have amended parental rights and student privacy policies to effectively revert them to those from a 2024 bill that the legislature updated to make more trans-friendly. The policies would have led to the forced outing of trans children to their parents, even when those parents were unsupportive.

“When we challenged this initiative in court two years ago, we represented moms, school nurses, and advocates for youth in crisis,” said Tiffani Lennon, the executive director of Legal Voice, who was prepared to fight the initiative if it was passed. “They all recognized the law’s dishonesty and knew firsthand that young people need access to confidential support. This election, voters carried that vision forward, protecting survivors of sexual assault, LGBTQ+ youth, and young people who live in unsafe homes.”

For nearly a week after the election, the choice on Washington’s ballot initiative 001 remained too close to call. However, today, with 95% of the votes counted, the Associated Press called the vote for the No side, which held 52.5% of the ballots cast.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 2 days ago* (3 children)

They touch on it near the end of the article, but while we upheld the confidentiality initiative (which I initially thought lost because I failed to realize MY area county wanted it shot down, but the rest of the state pulled ahead), the voters did push through a ban on trans girls in sports, and all girls need to have their gender verified (in exactly the ways you'd think they would) before playing. NONE of this applies to boys, trans or otherwise. It's sexism and bigotry, and it makes me ashamed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    NONE of this applies to boys, trans or otherwise.

    I'm hoping this will get the new law shot down by the courts on Title 9 grounds. It could easily be construed as discrimination against girls in an academic setting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago

    I believe the Seattle Public School District (among other entities) are suing because of exactly that (and, you know, the state mandated sexual assault if you're a girl who wants to play sports). Fingers crossed the law gets shitcanned ASAP

  • source
  • parent