all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 1 day ago

Love this for him. Motherfucker will still end up with more money than 1000 people could spend in a lifetime but there’s always a chance the stress will take him down.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago

    Not defending Jensen but this lawsuit is hot garbage, and unlikely to succeed. I hope on principle they don’t settle.

    I mean, what’re they supposed to do? Say there might be an affair with a Chinese spy about to drop in their 10-K? As if that wouldn’t be more or less the same as it coming out in the media?

    You know it’s a company with a highly visible CEO, and that some people can’t resist sticking their dicks in a honeypot, so this was an obvious risk.

  • source
  • [+] [S] -15 points 1 day ago (5 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    You forgot to prompt the AI to include his jacket

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    If we can't use AI to mock the folks who make AI possible, why did we even invent irony?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I’d just point out that people who made AI possible are researchers and engineers, and Jensen is just a grifting market speculator, trying to put a price tag on something that can run on your own hardware rather than power hungry data center.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    people who made AI possible are researchers and engineers

    So we should be mad at them?

    No, they are not the ones shoving this shit down our throat and burning our future for a profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 6 points 1 day ago

    In a class-action lawsuit on Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Jensen Huang and Nvidia have been accused of causing shareholders "significant losses and damages." By failing to disclose the affair, shareholders led by Mark Kistenmacher say that the company artificially inflated its share price in potential violation of federal securities law.

    The filing also notes that the potential national security implications present "a material risk to the Company’s reputation and business prospects."

    . . . President Donald Trump was asked about the situation on Monday. He told reporters he had spoken with Huang and that the CEO "had absolutely no idea that the person in question was a spy."

    Lol

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    If only the singularity happened faster to save him. He must be thinking…

  • source