Rep. Thomas Massie moved Monday to force a vote to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, putting pressure on his fellow Republicans to decide whether to remove one of the Trump administration’s most prominent figures after the GOP’s sweeping midterm election losses.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

Are the republikkkans starting their "I barely knew the guy!" shpiel now, trying to look like one of the good ones since the Dems have wrestled back control of Congress?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    And imprison, pls.

  • source
  • 23 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 29 points 1 day ago

    So easy a republican can do it!

    Catch up, dems!

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Wild he's doing more leadership than Jeffries, who's just using it as a campaign fundraiser 🤷🙃

    I just launched an emergency petition to show OVERWHELMING support for Pete Hegseth's removal.

    SIGN: jeffries4ny.com - ty actblue spam

    Hakeem Jeffries

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    What kind of ineffectual asswipe jumps on campaign fundraising a week after the election? What the fuck do you even need funds for right now, Hakeem? If you just did the fucking job and then listed all the stuff you got done, you wouldn't even have to think about fundraising.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 23 hours ago (1 child)

    The leader's main job is fundraising. And recruiting candidates who can win. Jeffries has been very effective at both.

    He's got committee chairs / ranking members to handle specific issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Wonder if this is an effort to get a new SecDef confirmed BEFORE Dems step in. That way the new one has no history...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    How long do we think before the psyop bots finish their programming and return to continue to divide Americans?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Wasn't Massie voted out in the primary to a Republican Trump endorsed because he kept pushing for the release of the Epstein files?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Doesn’t he have to wait for the new dems to start their term first?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

    Have to say, Massie appears to be a good republican. This, being a pain in Trump's butt and getting the Epstein bill through. Shame he's not returning due to him being primaried earlier this year.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 day ago

    Yeah, he was one of the last few republicans who hadn't bought in fully to the trump cult-of-personality.

    The simple fact that he got primaried just goes to show how hopeless and irrecoverable that entire party is. The rot permeates republicanism at all levels.

    Maybe some voters still think there's such a thing as a "moderate republican," but they're either lying to themselves or they live under a rock in blissful ignorance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    He isn't an ally of any sort, but he does seem to be the last principled Republican. I'm sure his career is not over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 15 hours ago

    I'll take someone who has some principles and holds to them even if I don't agree with all of them.

    Congress is just rife with people who have abandoned them, or never had them in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago (1 child)

    So Limp Johnson is going to call another recess, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 8 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 10 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    Friends...

    READY YOUR POPCORN.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Seems like it would just be better for hegseth if they pushed this through before the new reps are seated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Probably. Personally I wish they'd hold off on any of this until 2028 and just laser focus on affordability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Rather the people in charge now went to jail for treason. Destroying the country from the inside working with Russia and Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    It's a nice thought, but we've seen all this before. I fully expect Democrats to run sham hearings for the next two years and get nothing meaningful done, but I hope I'm wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Meh, I'll hold my breath (obv. sarcastically) until money is dropped out of a collective recognition of the true lack of necessity, as it literally just maintains an imagination with an Earthbound/Mooby/gold horned bull statue, it will never be real.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    To reuse my own comment...

    They can and must do both. They are full time public servants and they all have staffers to help them research and write legislation.

    Saying 'don't do this until later' is a coded way of saying it isn't going to get done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 14 hours ago*

    Respectfully, I don't know that we've seen Democrats multi-task since the 1960's.

    I don't think they can focus on more than one issue, at least not effectively, which is why affordability has to be the priority. A majority of people can't afford food and rent, and we've seen a few states banning surveillance pricing to help with that, but it needs to happen at the federal level.

    The upside is that, assuming they do focus on affordability, they'll have more power in 2028 and that will make it more likely that any attempt to hold this regime accountable actually sticks.

  • source
  • parent