long read. quantum quote from somewhere;; 'if you think you understand quantum physics, you don't understand quantum physics'

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
12 comments in c/science@beehaw.org view that post
[–] 4 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

Well, it seems like god actually does play dice.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    I also suspect that consciousness is fundamental

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    I always hate how people misinterpret the whole probability thing in quantum mechanics, or think that Schrödinger's Cat was meant to prove something rather than the fact that it was to show the ridiculousness of some of Heisenberg's work, among others.

    The real issue is that the act of observing a quantum particle in any way that a human or their machines could possibly observe them necessarily alters the state of that particle in some way. It's like if the only way you could detect how far away a bullet sitting on the ground was from you was to fire another bullet at it and have it reflected back. Obviously whatever reading that were to give you is now no longer correct, the bullet has been moved by the detection bullet and possibly some other characteristics have changed. So you only do real detection at the moment you need to and realize that value is only valid in that moment and for everything else you use probabilities.

    Of course an oversimplification, but pretending there's something surreal and supernatural about quantum mechanics is just silly.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    This is an idiotic take that shows that you didn't even read the article, let alone have a basic understanding of quantum physics. Even if your take was right about the uncertainty principle, which it isnt, how does that explain non-locality? Entangled particles? How is that not surreal or supernatural?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    non-locality? Entangled particles? How is that not surreal or supernatural?

    Well for a couple reasons, a) they're real, b) they're natural 😜

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I know you're joking but something can be surreal and real at the same time. And that's why 'supernatural' is actually a kind of a dumb word, because if you go by its literal meaning nothing could ever qualify as being supernatural. Which is why the only definition that actually makes sense is something that SEEMS to violate the natural rules or order. Which I think particles that don't obey relativity or the established rules of physics for the macro world definitely apply.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (1 child)

    In school, I grasped chemistry with such clarity that other students would come to me for help but physics has always been impossibly difficult to make sense of.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] 1 point 1 week ago