No Stupid Questions

4,467 readers

632 active

68 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.

ex. How do I change oil
ex. How to tie shoes
ex. Can you cry underwater?

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!

Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice 🍉.

founded 4 years ago

moderation log

moderators

admin@lemmy.ca

If the Overton Window is a binding rule in political theory, why is espionage still unacceptable? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago by PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.ca

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are peeping toms everywhere. Some aren't even government entities (even though a number of them are, though this diversity ties into the question). Some also apply more force to it than others. But nobody is saying we should be spying on people anymore than anyone said that in past centuries.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Espionage is inherently deceitful. It's tolerated as a cost of modern life, but it is (by legal definition in many cases) engaging in illegal or unethical activity on behalf of a third party. If it were acceptable, it wouldn't be espionage, it would just be research.

permalink

fedilink

source

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

The overton window is no more a binding rule than moores law.

permalink

fedilink

source