Suppose the listing said “recertified.” SMART says 12 hours. The first self-test passes. I'd save all three, because the test result answers a different question from how many hours that disk has spent spinning.

We keep drive-arrival records at TechFuelHQ. There’s a field for the hours from SMART and a separate one for the FARM log on Seagate drives that expose it. No FARM log? Leave it blank. Writing down zero would turn a reading you never took into a claim the disk was new.

If you've sent a used disk back, what tipped the decision? I'd be interested in cases where something changed between unpacking it and finishing the first long test. No serial numbers needed.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 6 days ago (1 child)

I’ve seen cases where SMART returns clearly impossible data. Not incorrect or oddly formatted, numbers that just can’t be. Also, if a badblocks run returns bad blocks

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago

    Which attribute gave it away? Power-on hours against the date code on the label is the one I'd check first, since a drive built two years ago can't carry five years of hours. And when badblocks did find bad blocks, was SMART still reporting the disk as healthy?

  • source
  • parent