Sure the only county that has the capability to separate itself from the global internet and possessing state of the art AI models will use fucking chatGPT....

Also the claim that LLMs have no politics shows that the author and the editor know nothing about how LLMs and politics work.

Edit: in my first paragraph I am wrongly assuming relation between the state and these researchers.

Why didn't China use DeepSeek?

Shit article whose only cited source is "A research team led by energy policy experts at Chinese universities"

I would love some extra sources for this. A quick reading of the article makes me understand that the researchers have a lot of confidence in the correctness of the AI gradings of policies, which I have my doubts about.

The article worries about the fact that the energy policies score worse than expected, but this assumes that these scores are valid in the first place. There is lots of interesting research happening in trying to use AI for varying problems, but in each case results go from bad to promising, but never outright certainty. The fact that this article almost immediately gives the vibe that the AI results are trustworthy and a valid and desired alternative to the slow human analysis really rubs me the wrong way.