The film’s interviewees are depicted as mere “cogs” in a system that turns good progressive educated, non-Arab-hating gods in the sky into murderers.

This framing is dangerous. Focusing on the machinery of war – the surveillance systems, targeting procedures, algorithms, chains of command and political directives to explain how violence becomes systematic and scalable – completely misses the point.

The violence existed well before AI. The system of apartheid was in place for decades.

When you make the machine the protagonist, its operators turn into bystanders to their own actions. In a way, they are absolved.

What motivates them is a question that is never raised. Zionism and Jewish supremacy are never discussed.

Without confronting the ideology, the story becomes one about good or ordinary people caught inside a terrible system, rather than holding accountable people who have made deliberate choices within that system and who could have made other choices.

It fails to ask what Zionism has done to the Jewish Israeli psyche, what generations of being taught that Palestinian freedom represents an existential threat has produced, and of course what the manifestation of that thinking has meant for Palestinian bodies.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 1 week ago

Completely agree, though I'd say it would be hard to capture everything in one film. I really think this would have been better done as a series, going over everything and explaining the systemic hatred indoctrinated into most Israelis. Not some, not few, most.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    I think it depends what your goals are. This framing makes it easy to separate Israel (evil machine) from the people in it (Jews). That opens up more room for anti genocide anti-Zionist views on the west.

    Where it doesn't help is anyone who is legitimately seeking justice or a better future.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/palestine@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Zionism is one of liberalism's holiest of cows - and, like all of liberalism's holy cows, it seeks to protect it by pretending it doesn't exist.

  • source