Remember: robots aren't individuals, and are thus not officers like real dogs would be. Sniping them or passing them a cocktail is mere vandalism.
Right?
The question is, who gets sued when they murder a child in a car on sketchy pretext?
Remember: robots aren't individuals, and are thus not officers like real dogs would be. Sniping them or passing them a cocktail is mere vandalism.
Right?
The question is, who gets sued when they murder a child in a car on sketchy pretext?
They were fine building semi autonomous killbots that would be used what? By the US military on brown people on the other side of the world.
But brown people on your own side of the world is unconscionable?
The robot leopard eating faces company employees: certainly these robots will not eat faces.
but executives stood by the deal, while saying the robots would not be weaponized
Even if that was the only problem, even if they signed a paper agreeing to penalties if that claim was broken; I still wouldn't want it or believe them.
Don’t protest openly. Instead, build stealthy, plausibly deniable backdoors.
If the regime wants to play fucky-fuck games with engineers, we can get extremely creative with malicious compliance.
"these were supposed to be used to kill brown peoplein the middle east!"
What a bunch of useful idiots. What did they think they were building? Like, how can you be literate and this ignorant of history?
Imagine working at Boston Dynamics and not seeing this coming.
But... but... they were only supposed to use them on brown people abroad!
Well, to be fair... so-called "corporate culture" does do awful things to your brain - especially when you're young and naive. The cognitive dissonance (that is essentially mandatory) is so thick you could make (extremely toxic) cheese out of it.
all 4 comments