It looks like almost all of the incumbents kept their seats. What do you think of the outcome?

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

Guess people want to waste another half billion of our money on the damn Lansdown. So sad.

Pathetic that only 36% give a fuck enough to even vote. No wonder this city is going to shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    I expected more incumbents to lose their seats.

    The city isn't in great shape: transit is worse than it was before the O-Train, property taxes are apparently high relative to other municipalities, housing remains expensive af.

    I would have expected Ottawa voters to turf a few more of their city councillors in the expectation that we need something better. For what it's worth, 55% didn't vote for Sutcliffe, which sort of makes sense. But only Hubley lost his seat? I'm surprised.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    In Hamilton, most got turfed.

    But, only 147,196 out of 465,861 eligible voted. The lower the voter turnout, the higher the percentage votes are cast for Right Wing Christian Fascists. My new councilor said he has no party affiliation but somehow forgot he ran for Ford's PCs in the last provincial election.

    Ottawa voting was 314,393 out of 868,248 eligible voters casting a ballot.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Given the state of the economy, I think many people were complacent (to vote or not vote as it were) enough to stick with the incumbents ("the devil you know..."), unfortunately.

    On a side note, I am happy for the residents of Kanata South. (speaking as someone who used to work with the now former Councillor)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    I called Sutcliffe winning two months ago. Leiper could have fixed that, but that would have required transparency. Apparently we only get that after the election.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Leiper could have fixed that, but that would have required transparency.

    What? Are you saying "I'm not going to tell you what I'm going to do with taxes, but expect a levy on top of it" isn't a crowd pleaser? /s

    I lived in Leiper's ward for a while. He didn't show much empathy when we started finding drug paraphernalia scattered around the school, MUPs, and playgrounds, so he didn't get my vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment