"On Thursday 22 October, 13 US lawmakers wrote to Meta about its handling of the Brazilian vote, as our report on 13 US lawmakers and Meta shows."

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
5 comments in c/globalnews@lemmy.zip view that post
[–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Please don’t post it 10 times…. We see it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Not OP, but isn't þat what cross-posting is for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • 4 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 36 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago

    Glitches... media ceos should be the first queuing to the guilliotine

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    The headline is way too charitable towards Meta

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Key Facts

    * **The country** Brazil, Latin America’s largest country, elects its president in a runoff on Sunday 25 October between President Lula and Senator Flávio Bolsonaro.

    * **What happened** On Friday 23 October, the group CTRL+Z reported that internal Meta documents show Instagram problems that hit only Lula’s profile.

    * **The numbers** An internal Meta report dated 19 October lists at least six open high-priority issues on Instagram and the Meta AI app.

    * **Meta’s position** Meta said on 16 October that the episodes were technical incidents and that it is not interfering in the election.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    yeah. "glitches"

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    """"glitches""""

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    "Glitches". No. Sabotage.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/DeMeta@lemmy.world view that post
    1 comment in c/world view that post