iOS is adding the menu transparency that desktops have had for over 15 years. Android is adding AI. They are both just adding things that people already use and are calling them new.
post
iOS has a design change, but otherwise there is nothing interesting. Smartphones have been around for a quarter of a century, both smartphone hardware and software are extremely mature.
hardware and software are extremely mature
And that's a good thing, perhaps except for tinkering purposes. I have to rely on my phone for several things throughout the day, sometimes more than I'd like to, so the last thing I need is bugs introduced just for the sake of changing things.
I agree. It also means that you can spend $300-$400 on a smartphone and it does everything without lag and at a high quality level. What's more, you can use it for 3-4 years.
There are some niche use cases like specialist smartphone photography and high demand gaming where you might need a flagship, but IMO a relatively small part of the market.
The one thing I’m continually annoyed about though is battery management.
Why, in this day and age, do we not have a smartphone that can last on a single charge for a week? Instead, after a year or two of use, the devices with a glued in battery can barely last 8 hours on a charge.
Doesn’t seem all that smart.
I just got Android 16 via OTA update yesterday. Nothing changed.
It’s a short, and very general overview of the OSs. Kind of pointless. Non-paywalled link.
Apple’s going to add some transparency to buttons and call it a groundbreaking redesign while Android is going to go all in on AI.
So iPhones will become more Apple and Android will become more Google.
What I hate about these AI-comparison articles is that nobody of those so-called "journalists" understands, that Apple's AI runs locally on the device. Whereas Gemini runs in Google's cloud - which in turn means that Google get's a copy of every single request/prompt. Also, no mention of iOS 26's new call screening feature - which asks unknown callers for their name and purpose of the call and displays this on the screen before your phone starts to ring. And, again, it's all happening on-device.
...no mention of iOS 26’s new call screening feature - which asks unknown callers for their name and purpose of the call and displays this on the screen before your phone starts to ring.
Nice! Thanks for pointing this out!
Also, no mention of iOS 26’s new call screening feature - which asks unknown callers for their name and purpose of the call and displays this on the screen before your phone starts to ring. And, again, it’s all happening on-device.
I'm no fan of Android, but it's had this capability for years. This feels like Apple inventing the rectangle again.
Yes, for years. Proudly presented by Google's datacentres. It's not Apple inventing it again, it's Apple making it possible completely on-device.
There are plenty of reasons to dislike how often Android phones home (no pun intended), but not having my phone ring from bullshit calls is fine by me, even if Google retains the data. Creditors and healthcare providers can't legally leave messages, so I'm not sure what practical impact on privacy this has.
Don't get me wrong, I prefer anything running on-device, but this is a weird thing to point out as a deficiency in Android.
Every once in a while the ai part of my phone will get hot and I assume it got a new email or something. Generating emojis makes it a toaster!
Paywalled, so here's an archive link: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/dXVz1
all 12 comments