Maybe they can build tents from landlords? Stop treating housing as an investment. Devalue housing and start building.
post
Well, in Portugal a smallish group set up a peaceful tent camp in a square in Porto and the Municipal Police, apparently under orders from the Mayor (equivalent to "Mayor", the position here is actually "City Hall President") did a police charge on the demonstrators and the whole thing ended up on TV.
This was followed by big demonstrations, both in Porto and Lisbon, as well as much bigger encampments, this time in both.
Note that said Mayor is from the same political party as the Government, which is a rightwing part that was formed after the 1974 Revolution by the sons and daughters of those who had wealthy and priviledge under Fascism, and who have just passed a law to further reduce protections for renters in effect making it much more likely that what happenned to Maricarmen in next door Spain would also happen here.
Mind you the current situation of low salaries together with insane house prices and rents was created by governments of both that party and the "left" (but not really left, not since the 80s) mainstream party which have pretty much alternated in power ever since not long after the 74 Revolution.
Mind you, the problem of high costs of living - especially housing - and low incomes along with successive governments whose policies actually incentivise realestate bubbles is happening in almost all of Europe. I just mentioned this because it's funny how the idiot Mayor by acting like an autoritarian made the situation explode, similarly to how the violence in France exploded when the police used excessive force against children demonstration (though it's not violent yet in Portugal)
The fact that Porto city is like 80% a UNESCO heritage sight and the local residents need a ton of paperwork and money to get basic repairs done (on top of the crazy property bubble) is just nuts. Porto was the purest form of neoliberalism on steroids I've ever seen.
Talking about southern Europe, for years people have been warning politicians and all institutions that the housing situation was unsustainable. They were ignored as always, the numbers were helping their agenda.
Now we see the big cracks showing up. Will they listen? or let the situation aggravate?
More (public) housing needs to be built, taxes need to be raised (by a lot) for vacant homes and non-primary residences, and a better supervision should be put in place to avoid tax evasion.
Will European countries have the will to do what is required?
I'm in Portugal and it's hilarious (well, more like infuriating, really) that even the supposedly thinking Left (I'm a member of a small such party here and am thoroughly dissapointed with its leadership) haven't connected the dots yet on a problem which has been painfully obvious for more than a decade:
- The big problem of "low birth rates" and hence aging population of the country which in turn ends up cascading into all sorts of other problems (for example, an overloaded National Health Service because an aged population need a lot more healthcare services) and even justifies immigration (as a way to bring in working age adults to produce wealth here) can be pretty directly traced back to high house prices making people leave their parent's house much later (here in Portugal the average age for that is 34 years old!), thus having children much later which usually means fewer and because upsizing their home to have more children is also harder that too means fewer children, with the result that the average number of children per-family here is 1.8 when the replacement rate is 2.4 children.
I mean, even the far-right anti-immigration muppets would logically want lower housing costs so that the locals have more kids and no foreigners need come so that there's still people working to pay their pensions.
And don't get me started on how at this point half the young adults who get University degrees leave the country as soon as they get their degree, another thing which itself also feeds into things like a National Health Service under pressure (as many of those who leave are trained Doctors and Nurses).
Meanwhile, an ever greater fraction of ruling politicians have as a second job "realestate investor" - for example the Prime Minister here in Portugal is well know for owning 55 properties - so they have very clear personal incentives to make policies which result in realestate prices increases since that makes them wealthier (and screw everybody else), which in turn makes the situation of the country worse at many levels.
They'd let the situation aggravate and then blame it on immigrants and focus only on the violence of the few bad actors taking advantage of the situation. You can count on governments doing the wrong thing.
Inequality results in higher asset prices. They commodified housing and allowed massive inequality. Now housing is expensive.
This happens because if you have more money than you can spend you start looking for things to buy. Houses and land, for instance. The neoliberal hope is that hoarded wealth will trickle down through investments. But there really isn’t enough money-making enterprise for the billions available, so rich folks start buying up assets, which become super expensive.
To be clear, I’m not saying there’s more money than can be wisely invested. I’m saying the money is concentrated (often into the hands of the least discerning) and not efficiently distributed for utilization. If normal folks had extra cash, they might start a small business, but billionaires aren’t looking to open a trattoria or book store. They don’t have time for such minutiae, so they buy up land or gold or get into crypto schemes or some harebrained bullshit.
The neoliberal hope is that hoarded wealth will trickle down through investments.
It's not their hope, it's just one of the excuses invented by some Think Tank (probably in America and funded by somebody like the Koch brothers) to swindle the rest of people into thinking that the Neoliberal political ideology delivers something positive for more than just a small fraction of people.
If there is one thing I learned seeing the 2008 Crash from a front row position in the Finance Industry, is that every single Neoliberal pseudo-Economic saying (especially the stuff about Meritocracy) is complete total bollocks: when things got hard every single Neoliberal government out there chose to save and even increase the wealth of rich, using the law-making and executive powers of the state to imposed austerity for the rest to pay for it, and to manipulate their own currencies to boost asset values whilst in real terms income from work fell.
What they most definitelly did not do in any way form or shape was let the "constructive destruction of the Free Market" take its course.
Neoliberalism is what it does, not what it says on the tin.
Italy is protesting in every major city about living cost among the things. Meanwhile, in Florence, another super-luxury hotel opens in what once was a residential building. It costs 2500€ a night.
We don't need to change the current trajectory, we need to burn the world as it is and make something new.
There's way too many fucking luxury hotels. And most seem to stay empty.
I managed to score a suite at a VERY discounted price (90% off), for £100 a night, a few months ago when I went to Budapest, in such a hotel. During my one week stay, I saw a total of 5 guests/groups/families... out of the 100+ available rooms. Mind you, this was around the time things should've been ramping up to prime season...
I wonder when it will shift from protesting to dragging billionaires into the streets
The only way to lower the cost of housing, is to enact policies that force current homeowners, and basically everyone else in the current housing supply chain, to lose enormous amounts of money. Everyone from material suppliers to construction workers would go out of business, and everyone holding mortgages would immediately find themselves drowning in debt they will never be able to repay.
This would be political suicide for anyone willing to enact these policies. Imagine being the one who effectively tanked an entire industry, just to hit the "reset" switch on prices?
no comments (yet)