▲ 32 ▼ Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistake - gitbutler.com (blog.gitbutler.com) submitted 1 month ago by lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
▲ 82 ▼ Github co-creator & Pro Git author skewers Git 3.0's SHA-256 move (blog.gitbutler.com) submitted 1 month ago by tetrislife@leminal.space to c/programming@programming.dev 22 comments fedilink hide all child comments In a well-fleshed-out post, Scott Chacon shows how unneecessary Git 3.0's move to replace SHA-1 with SHA-256 is.
▲ 89 ▼ Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistake (blog.gitbutler.com) submitted 1 month ago by pylapp@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev 19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
▲ 72 ▼ Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistake (blog.gitbutler.com) submitted 1 month ago by codeinabox@programming.dev to c/git@programming.dev 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
▲ 14 ▼ Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistake (blog.gitbutler.com) submitted 1 month ago by rssbot@lemmy.bestiver.se [B] to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se comment fedilink hide all child comments Comments