all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Assuming Lula wins reelection one of the principal concerns of the country's national security interests should be banning U.S.-owned social media companies.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    At this point, there is a good chance the US would do what they did in Venezuela if Lula wins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I find unlikely, Lula is way more respected in the liberal "democracies" than Maduro. Not the Trump cares about but I think most of the staff could oppose this shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    i doubt it would be something like venezuela, but they WILL intervene somehow if lula wins. they aren't being too subtle about it.

    lula has commented on it, and the lawfare has already begun. the alternative media is already saying it. even us democrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago

    Fucking cancer of this world.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    they did it to jones manoel, an actual communist, when he was about to viralize to the mainatream from his great participation in a debate.

    if they did it to a much smaller figure, of course they'd do it to lula.

    people's minds will never be free for as long as they use us social media.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    In case it hasn't been obvious that the world has been trending back towards fascism for the better part of the last 20 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Just the liberal capitalist world because the mask of liberalism has to be pulled back in times of crisis to reveal how the system truly functions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    What I find sad is that these ads can make a difference. People should have already researched the candidates and their positions and know who they're going to vote for.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    you're telling me the company who helped cambridge analytics do their schemes with elections is doing it again? pikachu face

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The problem with bringing up Cambridge Analytica is that 1) their schemes were found not to be effective and 2) it feeds BlueAnon conspiracy theories.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    China proved right instance #1911

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    China supports Lula and is concerned about the USA putting their grease fingers in Brazil(again).

    Also China banning all american social media was the greatest decision they have ever made.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I don't know who that is so i might be wrong with my assumption to say that if Facebook is trying to stop this guy from being elected that that is reason enough to vote for him?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment