The majority of Democratic voters believe Israel has committed genocide in Gaza for the past three years. And they want the American politicians in both parties who supported it to pay.

In a poll released on Monday by the Center for Strategic Politics and commissioned by the magazine Liberal Currents, 683 Democratic voters were asked whether the next Democratic administration should "pursue criminal prosecution of members of the Trump and Biden administrations for actions taken related to Israel’s genocide in Gaza."

More than half, 57%, of the Democrats surveyed answered "yes," while only 22% answered "no" and another 22% said they "don't know."

Self-described "socialists" and "progressives" were most bullish on Gaza-focused prosecutions. But so were 52% of "liberals" and even 48% of Democrats who called themselves "moderate" or "conservative."

It is one of several questions in the poll about a hypothetical Democratic administration prosecuting its predecessors over policies considered deadly and destructive.

About two-thirds, 66%, said they wanted to see Trump administration officials prosecuted for actions taken during its aggressive war with Iran, which has led to the deaths of more than 1,700 civilians and wrought economic turmoil.

Nearly three-quarters, 72%, believed Trump officials should face similar accountability for their campaign of extrajudicial strikes on boats in the Caribbean and Pacific, which have killed more than 234 people in what a top United Nations official recently said may constitute "crimes against humanity."

And more than three-quarters said they wanted to see Trump officials face legal penalties for actions committed by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which have waged a violent mass deportation campaign that has entailed numerous documented due process violations, instances of racial profiling, and several shootings of immigrants and US citizens without clear justification.

The question about Gaza is the only one in the survey in which Democrats were asked about the prospect of prosecuting members of their own party as well as Republicans. And while fewer Democrats ultimately answered yes, it indicates that their ire toward the American politicians supporting the genocide transcends party loyalty.

The poll results come as some activists pursue accountability for the Biden administration in other ways. Last week, organizers launched a campaign to pressure universities and other prominent institutions to cut ties with what they called the "Genocide 20."

These are officials like former Secretary of State Tony Blinken and former National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan who crafted and defended the administration's policy of unrestricted military aid for Israel despite mounting evidence that it was killing scores of civilians and enacting a campaign of starvation against the people of Gaza.

The United States provided Israel with at least $17.9 billion in military assistance between October 7, 2023, and the end of former President Joe Biden's term in January 2025, according to Brown University’s Costs of War project. During that period, more than 47,000 Palestinians were confirmed killed, according to the Gaza Ministry of Health.

Since President Donald Trump returned to office, the US has continued to provide Israel with billions of dollars in military assistance, including $3.8 billion in regular annual military aid, while the Trump administration has approved billions more in arms sales and expedited weapons deliveries. The death toll has risen to nearly 74,000, according to official figures, but independent experts have suggested this may be a significant undercount.

According to Monday's poll, more than 4 in 5 Democrats said that “foreign policy (including Israel and Iran)” is important to them in deciding which candidates to support, compared with just 4% who said it is not.

Foreign policy has been a critical dividing line in several recent Democratic primaries, in which voters have revolted against candidates backed by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

This includes Democratic Michigan Congresswoman Haley Stevens, who was defeated by Abdul El-Sayed in a contest for the US Senate despite her more than $30 million in backing from AIPAC, which helped to turn it into the most expensive Democratic primary ever.

AIPAC-backed House candidates have similarly suffered high-profile defeats at the hands of progressives calling to cut off US funding for Israel. Some of the victors include Chris Rabb in Pennsylvania, Brad Lander and Darializa Avila Chevalier in New York, and Aisha Wahab, who won a special election in California.


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
14 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 23 points 1 month ago*

One thing that really got my goat was when Jose Andres got a medal from Biden basically to shut him up. To me it seemed like such a betrayal of those World Central Kitchen workers who were deliberately targeted and murdered by the IDF. He should have told Biden to stick that fucking medal up his ass.

Of course now, living in Trumpistan in 2026, those crimes pale in comparison to murdering a whole fucking school full of grade school aged girls.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I'm all for it. Seriously.

    Considering the dialogue happening in many threads, I think it's important to remember that Democrats and Republicans are still not the same. This is an example of an issue where many Democrats are failing us, yes. Just don't expand that into "bOtH sIdEs" when that's not true.

    But hells yes. We need to prosecute criminals, and we need to throw out establishment Democrats and get real progressives running and winning. Always support the best candidate running (before/in the primaries, and then whoever makes it to the general).

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Same. Prosecute and punish. They criminally abused their power and clearly and obviously used it for mass-murder. Nuremberg showed us exactly what needs to happen here. Party doesnt matter in this case.

    The way to get out of this is to NOT ever again elect another zionism supporter to the president or congress. Unless we do that we will stay captured by their cabal and we'll keep killing. That means most of the mainstream Dems and all the mainstream republicans cant be elected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    That means most of the mainstream Dems and all the mainstream republicans cant be elected.

    While you are correct, the problem is that when it comes down to the general election and the choice is a fascist Republican or a Democrat who is an Israel supporter, then there's no difference between them on that front - but there are still differences on other issues, so it's still important to get out and vote against fascism, even though it sucks.

    Also, in my humble opinion, Israel is more a symptom of the problem of corruption; it's certainly hardly the only source. Our oligarchs in general are the worst cause, but foreign influence is also not great, and Israel does have deep claws in there, for sure.

    But it just points back to the reality: Getting involved well before the general; well before the primary, to lend support to progressive candidates who are NOT beholden to the oligarchs or foreign influences and corruption.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    I agree 95%, but I do wonder if acting in this way will just lead us to the same sort of astroterfed elections from here on out. We seemed to have a government thats captured in a permanenet, systematic way now. When will zionist dominance over our political landscape ever be lifted?

    So I think we have to think past short term results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    Nothing prevents you from supporting better candidates. But you should always support a better (or less shitty) candidate in a primary/election where possible.

    Canvas for the politician you prefer before the primary, then vote for them if they make it into the primary. If they or whatever other candidate you like less makes it into the general, voting for them is still better than voting for the party running a candidate that would be worse.

    Meanwhile, doing the above does not prevent anyone from trying to organize protests to throw out the system and replace with a new one, or support an alternate party, although the tipping point for where it makes sense to vote for a third party is difficult, because any time people vote enough for a third party such that the less-evil party also loses, everyone loses.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    One day, everyone will have always been against this.

    It's a double pointed quote. The first point is that we should be accepting of the masses that have heard our message of truth through the noise of the louder false narrative. The ed Sheeran backlash really was the first major major shift Ive seen in this. I was so use to the "this guy that said 'free Palestine' got silenced again" that is was so weird to keep hearing about it the next day. That others stood up in solidarity. It was such a shift from what I've seen since 2023. I almost didn't know how to react to it.

    The second point is that we should not allow those that had direct support of this genocide to pretend that they were against it from the start. The Kamala's, the New York times, the liberal Zionist that spent the whole time screaming "both sides" and "Hamas run health ministry". They need to be held to account.

    And finally, we are not there yet. We are at the "it's unpopular to support the genocide" stage. We have conquer the messaging and the narratives of those that committed this genocide. But, until we have an actual material impact that allows the children of Gaza a life of dignity and prosperity, we have done nothing yet.

    Take this as an inspiration to join the right side of history and work towards the material changes that do actually matter. Because a canceled concert or a poll like the OP isn't a material victory. It is a symbolic victory. Let that symbolism carry us further in our resistance.

    Let that let us welcome those that were decived and have learned from our words. While not forgetting that the criminals, perpetrators, and talking heads (media) that allowed this genocide should be offered no leniency.

    We must not confuse these two groups from one another. It is vital to reaching material changes and justice for Gaza and all of Palestine from the river to the sea.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    The second point is that we should not allow those that had direct support of this genocide to pretend that they were against it from the start.

    I don't think that's the meaning of the quote... Kind of the opposite, really

    It means the tides will shift, and suddenly it will be socially unacceptable to harass mixed race couples. The people who would have thrown rocks at them decades before will be inviting them over for dinner and cooing over pictures of their grandchildren

    It'll be a faux pas to bring up this change, even

    There is no justice for a genocide. There's no way to even the scales, and people are almost never punished for going along with the group consensus

    At best, the killing will stop and a handful of leaders directly responsible will be held to account. Maybe some examples will be made of a few IDF soldiers. Maybe international peacekeepers will be installed in Gaza and the West Bank, there's a small chance Palestine is granted statehood due to overwhelming international pressure

    Maybe, maybe, there will be a congressional inquiry into the part arms manufacturers played here, but nothing will come of it. No one is going to go after Biden or Congress members over their role... They'll just have always been against it secretly, and everyone will ignore their voting records

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Lets get everyone in court if they are innocent whats the big deal 🤪

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Ok, but we gotta get these Project 2025 goons out of powerful positions. After that, you can have all the ex-presidents you want. In fact, we'll cut you a deal: arrest one president, get 5 billionaires for free.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    "Majority of Democratic Voters Hold Favorable Views of Kamala Harris and Gavin Newsom" is a headline you won't read on commondreams.org about the same poll.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 9 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    I'm good with that, in fact if they do care about the rule of law, that's what they should be doing.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    But the majority of Democratic donors do not.

    Place your bets now on what'll actually happen!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    right?! lol

    it doesn't seem to matter what democats want since they keep voting for democrats anyways no matter how many times they're fooled.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    Yes. Lock up these war criminal pedophiles

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    you're a few decades behind with your nonsense.
    Did Bush get to the ICC yet? LOL

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    How can you want that and still be complicit in genocide?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 1 comment in c/usa@midwest.social view that post

    Hey, cheers to that.

    And while we’re at it, Clinton deserves a very fucking hard look vis a vis Epstein, as do many other politicians and oligarchs and celebrities on both sides of the political spectrum.

  • source