I expect that any such proposal would be vetoed upon reaching the Security Council.

Important to remember, nobody thought the Security Council was actually a good idea. We added it because it was necessary to prevent the UN from meeting the same fate as its predecessor the League of Nations--fizzling out due to not enough big countries joining something that would limit their power.

It's not a good system, it's just better than nothing, and nothing was basically the alternative that the UN arose from. In that regard it has been very successful.

It's sort of crazy that a country like the UK, which hasn't been globally relevant in nearly a century, continues to hold enormous sway over it's African, South American, and Pacific peers. Then you've got the real heavyweights - the US, Russia, and China - routinely aligning on policy that only ever seem to make the planet worse.

The UN cannot reliably function as a global organization if a handful of states hold such outsized influence. Especially when these countries are engaged in military and economic predation of their neighbors.

That moment when you find out you agree with a piece of shit.

Fricking amazing idea and also never going to happen.