"Non voglio leggere quello che non hai scritto" - L'intelligenza artificiale aiuta a scrivere meglio e più velocemente, ma non sa scrivere!Gente che non ha mai scritto testi originali, all'improvviso produce proposte di design, piani aziendali, e altra roba generata dall'intelligenza artificiale.Tutta profondamente illeggibile!Ecco la mia frustrazione ma l'intelligenza artificiale può anche offrire valore alla scrittura.blog.colinbreck.com/i-dont-wan@aitech

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

@informapirata @aitech D'accordo sullo spirito generale dell'articolo, ma poi mi perdo nel dettaglio. C'è una ragione tecnica per cui i LLM sono definiti come inaffidabili per scrivere, ma affidabili per correggere? Se, come dice l'autore, fa errori quando gli fai scrivere un paragrafo in autonomia, perché dovrebbe essere più efficace nel segnalarti gli errori che fai tu? Intendo proprio errori fattuali e interpretativi (quelli per cui ti serve un editor vero), non grammatica e refusi.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago

    @effeindi @aitech la correzione, la formattazione, l'editing e anche i riassunti sono processi ripetitivi e strutturati; siccome gli strumenti di IA, rispetto agli umani, hanno la capacità di non distrarsi troppo quando affrontano processi ripetitivi, questo è un contributo ch possono dare senza impattare sulla propria creatività

  • source
  • parent
  • 7 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    "If you didn't take the time to write it. Don't expect me to take my time to read it."

    LLMs are destroying our cognition.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    AI websites fucking suck. Every annoying thing about finding cooking recipes on the internet was somehow coopted and magnified by these hacks. They all look and sound exactly the same and they have URLs that are just "WhatYouSearchedFor.com". It's unbelievably irritating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I'm noticing my own company doing this now. Everything that gets shown to potential customers is so obviously AI generated, and it all looks cheap as fuck.

    I don't know how the leaders in the company fail to see how sloppy everything has become... Everything looks like slop. It's beginning to be embarrassing to work here. Yet... Everywhere looks similarly bad.

    The tech industry is so fucked right now. It's going to collapse on itself even if the US government considers ai too big to fail and props them up. No one wants to buy slop. Why would they?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    A coworker sent me an eight page summary which could be boiled down to simply “change part number A for part number B”. I wrestled with it for a while thinking “How unusual for someone to write a report for just me to read” before I realized I was looking at AI vomit.

    We were talking over voice chat at the time and I had to scramble to obfuscate the sheer contempt in my voice after saying “Did you just send me an AI report?!” and keep things civil.

    I later complained to another coworker about it, in vague terms without naming names because I don’t need office drama, and they immediately knew who I was talking about because there’s only one AI fan in our group. Whoops.

    Anyway I’m not reading an eight page report you probably didn’t even read before sending it to me.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    After writing a paragraph, many times I would ask the AI to ensure what I had written was correct by referencing the source code or configuration, or examining production logs or metrics. For example, ensuring I had correctly described which columns in the database were indexed, or how the rows in the Parquet files were sorted. This allowed me to stay in the context of writing, often moving on to the next paragraph while the AI verified the previous one. It helped me spot important omissions and inaccuracies.

    "Am I a joke to you?" - Editors, probably

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Even this is LLM generated? It is not—it is!!!

  • source