all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 57 points 1 month ago (1 child)

is Denmark aware of this deal?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 54 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    In Denmark the news are

    "Trump agrees not to have Greenland" and in exchange gets what he's been offered from the start and more or less already had access to

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Smart move on Denmark because Trump is so stupid he will actually believe that he is in control of Greenland while Denmark probably got some sweet deal. It's literally been NATO protected for decades and hasn't changed even after this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I just hope they included a paragraph 5 involvement ad a condition

    That said, am agreement with Trump is not really a binding agreement, the way it looks at the moment

    In Danish news, the agreement is about Trump agreeing not to have Greenland

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    News in Denmark

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago*

    I'm certain the Danes did what they thought was best and it seems the "deal" is a nothing burger anyway, but don't fool yourselves : placating the bully is a mistake and won't even work. The moment he feels like it, he'll renege. US signatures are written in pencil.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    What the actual fuck?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)