all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Clickbait AP headline. He specifically said he wouldn't use those words or label but wants deep strategic partnership.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Got a link for that claim? I haven't been able to find that statement anywhere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-addresses-eu-parliament-9.7346339

    ”Carney and his team have been downplaying the idea of using "associate member" to describe a new partnership since it was first floated in a story in the Wall Street Journal last week that cited unidentified sources.

    When asked Thursday about the idea of Canada being an "associate member," Carney said the "substance" of the agreement is more important than the label.

    The prime minister said that Canada isn't looking to be a full member of the EU and that the final agreement of the alliance would be debated and voted on in Canada's Parliament.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago

    Fake news. Canada wouldn't dare mess with USAs Monroe doctrine. Like trump said, this partnership with EU is laughable and childish

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Looks like the commonwealth and EU are going to split off and leave the US to trade and have military alliances with only israel.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Could this be done without a referendum?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    As a European, I welcome our Canadian friends!

  • source