all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wild.

I wonder if this is at the request of intelligence agencies who need more attack surfaces to inject monitoring?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    "It's cheaper" is a simpler explanation, and therefore more likely the right one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    That doesn't make sense when you stack it against the cost of other efforts Google takes with the pixel phones surrounding security. MTE is arguably more important than even the titan chip, and a whole security enclave isn't exactly cheap either.

  • source
  • parent
  • 87 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    51 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    11 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    2 comments in c/graphene_os@lemmy.sdf.org view that post
    1 comment in c/security@lemmy.ml view that post