all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Some people might have overestimated, others might have underestimated, others pushed misinformation, some changed their minds, others never bothered to make a numerical prediction. Saying "than first thought" without saying who "thought" is very meaningless.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Right. We never needed a genius making numerical predictions to KNOW that EVs would be beneficial emission-wise. This became real to me when I first saw a Honda Insight in year 2000 and started taking EVs seriously. We didn't just "think", we KNEW.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    They couldn't provide a graph showing CO2 emissions over time, including the embedded energy in making the car and the point at which a new EV starts to have a lower impact than keeping a combustion engine car running? I swear I've seen that kind of graph before in studies/aricles on this topic and it's a great at-a-glance way to visualise it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    I have seen that as well in a norwegian car magazine. Iirc it was a little under a year. 8 ish months? But ofcourse the graph would vary wildly baded on monthly km driven. And i do not remeber what km/month they used.
    A longer commute would recoup the difference much faster then a short one.

  • source
  • parent