This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/antiwork by /u/Leonine94 on 2026-08-11 17:02:38+00:00.


“This study confirms what we have known for years: Medicare for All saves lives and saves money. In fact, guaranteeing healthcare as a human right through a Medicare for All, single-payer system would cost $1 trillion less than our current dysfunctional system. It would save working families thousands of dollars a year. And it would prevent over 100,000 Americans from dying unnecessarily each and every year because they cannot make it to a doctor in time,” Senator Sanders said. “At a time when 15 million Americans are being thrown off the healthcare they have and 20 million Americans have already seen their premiums double, on average, as a result of Trump’s so-called ‘Big Beautiful Bill,’ we need Medicare for All now more than ever. The time is now to end the greed of the big insurance and drug companies and pass Medicare for All.”

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
43 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 42 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Yes, but billionaires need superyachts and rocket ships. Won’t someone please think of the billionaires?!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Okay, but those savings of $1 trillion could in principle be used (in part) for more superyachts and such for billionaires.

    It's only specifically those billionaires who are heavily invested into the health care industry who might stand to profit from maintaining the status quo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    It would SAVE Money? For the WORKING Class? That sounds TERRIBLE!

    -Republicans making $20000 a Year!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    No. It's accurate. They're the kind of people who think of themselves as temporarily embarrassed millionaires, and they'll be damned if their hard-earned future money goes to the poor when they finally strike it rich.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    One of the things imprinted from my young life was sitting in my friend's house. I was maybe 8 or 9? Anyway, we were waiting for something else to come on like Happy Days or Dukes of Hazzard or something. These were the days of most households having one TV, maybe color if that family splurged and about 2-3 channels, LOL.

    His parents were watching some local debate between two local candidates, possibly on PBS? The young guy struck me as a bit of a dumbass and had kind of slimey used car salesman vibes and the older guy seemed to be talking sense. Don't really remember many details, and hell, I was a kid anyway.

    Thing winds up and my friend's dad is red-faced with anger over it and is growling about how the older guy will "raise my taxes!".

    Did I say we were sitting in my friend's house? I left out the part that he lived in a trailer. My friend was poor, as was I - both our parents had bought large amounts of land in remote areas and put cheap houses on them. It is not likely at all that we were going to have our taxes raised in any way we'd really notice. I remember asking my parents about this reaction and I remember them laughing at the absurdity...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    In other words, fascism is killing 114k people every single year.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It's actually capitalism why we have fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    In fairness, properly regulated capitalism is doing a bit better in many places.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure that's just a blip, a temporary roadblock on capitalism's path in those places. It'll only last until the right, or rather, the wrong people gain political power in those regions -- something that capitalists work towards endlessly. Once some morally flexible political elements gain power, the wealthy who put put those elements in place, will simply bribe them into deregulating everything they can which will allow capitalism to run its natural course.

    Things looked pretty good in the USA for a long time too. Then the capitalists started supporting political candidates that convinced the public that the very regulations that protected people and the environment were really bad things that were hurting people. They got voters to believe that deregulation would allow everyone to be millionaires and everything would be puppies and butterflies forever.

    We all know what deregulation really led to, of course. But as the saying goes, it's far easier to fool a person than it is to convince them they've been fooled. Getting people to admit they were fooled, especially against an endless barrage of propaganda from the capitalists, has been seemingly impossible. The fools, supported by their capitalist masters, are clinging to power and blocking all efforts to fix our problems. Probably because if the problems do get fixed, it'll be the final proof that the fools were fooled in the first place, and they can't allow that. They'd rather live out their days in squalor, breathing poison until they finally lay down in the graves they've dug for us all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Well, first of all, I agree pretty much with everything you said, basically. lol.

    I'm not sure, though, that I've seen a better system than regulated capitalism anywhere. I think the countries that are doing the best in the world right now are just that, and that deregulation and just flat out oligarchial corruption is the problem in the US more than the foundation of capitalism.

    And I explicitely agree that there is constant pressure toward that corruption. Countries have to constantly fight to keep it at bay, or perhaps they lose progress and have to fight to regain progress.

    I just haven't seen anything that works better. Like how I've heard it said "Representative democracy is the worst form of government… except all the others." heh

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    But That's a trillion not going directly into billionaire pockets

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    In other words, our private heathcare system kills 114,000 people a year because it's not profitable to keep them alive.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    And imagine how well the nonprofit hospitals would be doing since we'd actually be getting paid

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    This is just too much common sense. A plan, to save money and actually help average Americans. I wonder if life would be positively different if Bernie had won the 2016 Democratic primary.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • But company profits go down.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    But DEATH PANELS!...and Freedom!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    We have death panels. It's the insurance companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    A few 9/11s a month. If it were terrorism, we’d write a new constitution.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    This point deserves repeating even though it may be common knowledge among those who are well informed on the issue; people in red states hate the cost of healthcare also, but they might not care to listen to Bernie about it. So the more people talking about it the better

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)