Call for testing: Restricting trait implementability and field mutability

submitted 3 months ago by u_1f914@lemmy.world to c/rust@programming.dev

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So basically language support for sealed traits and reducing need for getter functions. Kinda neat but not that significant.

[–] KillTheMule@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

As mentioned in the article, it enables scenarios that getters/setters can't because of the borrow checker.

parent

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Yes and no.

And you clearly missed the enums part.

parent

post