top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 44 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Name and shame. If you use AI to fail to do your job as HR, then you're clearly not worth working with/for.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    hahaha, this is higher effort than most HR departments.

    80% will not even send an email. Of the remaining, 19% will use a template, no money wasted on AI model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Not sure if AI or someone messing up a mailmerge. Shame on them for having that template either way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Mail merge is clinical [userName], but this is straight up asking for a generated response...

    It literally says "write"...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I’ve seen similar instructions in letter templates for HR stuff pre-AI, but again it’s messed up either way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why would they redact the company's name? I'd be highlighting that shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Wait, you got an email saying they weren't hiring you?

    I've never seen this, ever. Lol

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I (pre-transition) waited a week for a local chain store to say yes or no, then next time I visited I realised that a) they hired more people so the vacancy was closed, and b) they only hire girls. There was one woman and the rest were under 20.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Dodged a bullet.

  • source