But these reasonable concerns are then drowned out by ridiculous NIMBYs resistant to any and all change, who would rather keep our country hooked on oil and their county’s library falling apart so they can look out over their neighbor’s corn field, where most of its output feeds inefficient ethanol production, without having to see an “ugly” wind farm. So much of this conversation is infected with parrot insane culture war lies about solar and wind. Adding data centers to this rhetorical mess has only accelerated the conversation's futility.

...

Green energy is, plainly, both actually useful and sorely needed for the green transition. There’s simply no comparison. As a democracy, nothing is stopping us from choosing to build useful infrastructure while rejecting projects that impoverish our communities in favor of the wealth of the few. But to do so, we need to begin agreeing on what counts as a beneficial project. Until then, our planning processes will continue to sputter, directionless in the face of public that can’t distinguish between clean energy and a polluting money pit.

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/41100904

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
3 comments in c/green@lemmy.ml view that post
[–] 7 points 3 months ago

Save our Sunsets is a grass roots group...

Someone ought to check that claim.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, if green energy is used to immiserate people they’ll be against it…

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Looks like the NIMBY's are at it again (funded by the fossil fuel industry as usual).

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/environment@sh.itjust.works view that post

    Bullshit. The preexisting anti-renewable crowd is much more likely trying to prop up their flailing "movement" by tapping into the anti-data center energy, not the other way around.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/energy@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    Astroturfing efforts no doubt.

  • source