That is implying the US would care about tyranny without also gaining some other advantage while fighting it. She does not.

America supports way worse things when it helps the corporations.

They do have oil

well no… it would depend on if the united states had oil or not!

Half of that statement rests on a completely made up version of what the US, and has been for a while, to the world.

In real fact it’s only true to the extent that there is an opportunity to exploit resource extraction in the US, which informs a large part of the US’s view of any given country’s democratic health.

So maybe, but not for the reasons everyone wants to think.

Not unless they find oil... they care shit otherwise

Maybe at some point this was true, now a days they’d just be taking pointers

The Untied States

This implies the US cares about tyranny rather than the reality of helping create it around the world.

If the US saw what the US was doing it would probably be jealous. That is about it.

This looks like a challenge for training quick speaking English skills.

Tell that to the Uyghers.

What the United States is doing in the United States that would case the United States to liberate the United States....? Arresting the Tate brothers.