all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 79 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Wouldn't that, in effect, double homelessness?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Many people are divided on the issue.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I heard public opinion was split down the middle

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    bipartisan for different reasons

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    That's why I vote for the Lib Dems, who will instead feed the homeless into an environmentally friendly mulching process. /s

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Since it's 2026, they are already in half so we will try to cut them in to quarters for 2027.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    But won't that mean there are twice as many of them?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Solomon said only their true home will let them be homeless rather than see them cut in half.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    "BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE!"

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    I'm unfamiliar with English politics? Are conservatives there like the kind we have in America? If so, I'm so sorry. This ad however suggests that they are probably very similar.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago