-34
AI Outperforms Law Professors in Stanford Law Study (law.stanford.edu)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

AI shouldn’t practice law for the same reasons voting machines shouldn’t use touchscreens to write to a database: humans cannot see or audit the process between input and result.

Of course, just like voting machines, this won’t stop anyone

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I mean, a human can audit the code. Paper voting can still be messed with. I would like an open source secure voting platform to try with other things for a few years first, just to see if they could get something reliable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    I agree but it's also a matter of education. The voting system and legal system should be reasonable (as in able to reasoned about) the plurality of people.

    For the plurality of people I just saw I work on computers and that is descriptive enough for them to know they don't know enough to talk anymore in depth about my work lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Man, these law professors and shit really don't want their students to have jobs 10 years from now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] -2 points 3 months ago

    Bullshit machine better at bullshit than professor of bullshit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •