all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 110 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Never forget, there is no acceptable form of resistance to oppression.

If you use physical violence in response to violence you will be told you're just as bad as your oppressor.

If you destroy property as a form of direct action you will be lumped in with looters and hooligans and told that invalidates your cause.

If you block traffic, or engage in other forms of nonviolent nondestructive civil disobedience, you'll be told that you're getting in the way of struggling people that just want to do their job and collect a paycheck.

If you physically impede nothing and no one, but use only signs and shouts, you will be told that if your position held any weight you'd be able to debate people and convince them to your side.

If you argue calmly with people in public, using reason to explain yourself, you will be told that you're just as annoying as the people you're arguing against. Or that you need to be nicer. Or that its your fault that your abusers are acting the way they do because you're not convincing them in the right way.

If you do nothing but simply exist as you are, you'll be told that your existence is an inconvenience for other people or a problem for society.

If you go out of your way to hide yourself then you'll be told that any problems you have are your own fault because you didn't do more to solve them.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    People need to grow fucking spines. That's the answer to our societies problems. Someone tries to abuse you? FUCKING CUT THEM. WITH A KNIFE.

    Someone tries to abuse someone in front of you? CUT THEM WITH A FUCKING KNIFE

    someone defends abusing people? CUT THEM WITH A FUCKING KNIFE.

    The people degrading our society and using the governments monopoly on violence only understand violence. Nothing else will convince them to not do shitty things. There is no debating these people into morals.

    Immediate and extreme consequences are the only thing that they understand, but they never receive it because our society is much more concerned with being polite.

    CUT THEIR FUCKING FACE SO EVERYONE WILL KNOW WHO THEY ARE. NAZI SCARS ARE BACK ON THE MENU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I stole Thor's hammer. Well, OK. Actually a construction of a neighbor's fence left it in my yard after they finished and left. Close enough, IMO. I was thinking about attaching a sickle with a click to spin it in fashion around the head from the face to the peen at will to strike. It's a forge hammer but I like it a lot. I also like your very sharp references being arranged around it. Just Sayan, that'd be fucking Super, IYKWIM.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 3 months ago

    A nearly impossible tension to resolve, and a tension that I couldn’t even conceive of until I read this.

    I used to be such a fair minded centrist. Me, a white cis man, existing in a society built by people like me for people like me, taking for granted the ultimate privilege that conferred on: to not be political.

    It’s embarrassing but useful to continually be confronted with vestiges of that privilege.

    I don’t know who needs to hear this, but the phrase “I’m not political” is a phrase inseparable from institutional bigotry, and soaked in the blood of minorities.

    If you think that’s a dramatic statement, you’re the one who needed to hear it.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    To those getting "yes but" thoughts - which would've been me included, some ten years ago - it is unreasonable - perhaps even unethical - to demand restraint, dictate procedure or moralize marginalized people's fight for liberation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not sure the cops can guess the gender by the way a brick hits them?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    As a disabled person, I would like to do the intersectionality dance with y'all and say this is an issue we have too. And it offing fucks me piss so much.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Fuck That

    break the tools of the oppressors

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Welcome to how women are spoken to

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    "WelComE tO WoMAnhOoD!"

    Just so you know, that's generally considered an extremely patronising thing to say. Don't be surprised if anybody tells you to fuck off if you continue to make similar remarks in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    I think this is mostly satire though...

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    This post is definitely satire but they are satirizing people who genuinely think these things

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (9 children)

    Is it satire with a much more firm titanium alloy hammering with a wide peen impacting more than any heads left to count?

    Or better yet, If we burnt Stark's Mani like the Ledger's Joker and no rich sucker trick-fooled every real skill to undo the only one that came here to keep life from committing this obvious collective suicide (and not just ours but at a Cosmic Cohesion) we might not even need Thanos to do the dirty work since the place wouldn't be poisoned, like DuPont.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (7 children)

    IK. I lost count of the cognitive dimensions I sort through. Hard to word any of it in this crippled language in development. I try to allude but...shrug...sooner or later. I'm a stranger from a strange infinite dimensions other than you. If that bothers you, I have no apology. It's way more complicated than that word even alludes too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    Have fun with learning and sarcasm!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    I wasn't being sarcastic, I don't get your whole deal but I hope you have fun with it :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    I know. I was. I'd apologize for having to spell that out for you but I can't bother to care about your misunderstanding unless you spell that out and ask my true purpose and meaning regarding what you originally "questioned" about.

    For all sakes and points, one word Q will never do more than guarantee your stoned nature, come morning. No matter how short you think I may be. Especially if one neglects to put their call in proper final declaration in punctuation. I got 50 pages into that Genesis and dropped the notion of reading more on that dimension. I got enough trying to translate the mass gibberish emoslanderslap on one done burning planet's history.

    This language is certainly incomplete regardless of how close. Especially when everyone thinks they understand it, like you seem to think you do. I know enough about it to understand I must continue studying it in forms I'm still measuring dimensions of existences that are new to me, even. Good luck, kid. In all fairness, you did tell me to have fun!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    Well that's just condescending and unkind. Goodbye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Apologies, as I am truly blind to the unreal. Even Ledger sees it better than I. Judgement isn't what you have misread it be so unreal . I know better than to fiddle with that so I don't catch myself impacting unreal.

    It does make sense you misread it as such, though. You started this, one word, without it actually being a question. What do you mean to Voodoo?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    No, no, its condescending and unkind :) doesn't matter which reality you choose to subscribe to. You can continue to live as whatever your identity is and in whatever reality you choose, I won't judge you for either, but when you start asserting things about me while being sarcastic at me and calling me a kid, seemingly all because I didnt put a question mark at the end of one of my comments, that is plain condescending and unkind.

    If you refuse to be kind and courteous, then I would kindly ask you to refrain from interacting with me any further.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Cause violence solves violence all in the name of peace.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago*

    Every fight for more rights for more people has had this tension.

    I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

    -- MLK

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 16 points 3 months ago

    You're the one assuming violence. All this post mentions is anger being seen as coming from "socialized male violence." Are you saying that us getting angry is tantamount to us getting violent, or do you just want to shove your own self righteousness into a conversation where it doesn't belong?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    On one hand sometimes yes you have to use violence to gain peace which sucks but is what it is, and on the other hand when I'm out there I'm not fighting in the name of peace I'm fighting for my rights as a human.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    How do you achieve peace while someone is running around shooting anyone they see? They will not listen to you. They will not tire or get bored. They will never stop.

    How do you, oh wise one, propose we deal with such a situation, if violence is always wrong?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You're not familiar with the Tolerance Paradox?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • No. I was just shortening your response. If you want the best move, read Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Anson Heinlein. There's an infinite complex more dimensions to cognate that way and the author is...well...uh...knot...or...hmm...hard to spell it out but, yeah.

    What the fuck is reality?> Ever do the pure logic on that? That is so simple you only get distracted by imagination. At least he's not far from there.

  • source
  • parent