all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] -4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Nope. But your russianphobia is showing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yes, I am biased against Russia's totalitarian government in the same way I am against the growing one in the US. What's your point? That's supposed to be a bad thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    But you saing that she is a Russian asset when she isn't, is russianphobia and misinformation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If she’s not a spoiler, why doesn’t she run in Democratic primaries? Or non-battleground states? Or run down ballot candidates?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -7 points 1 year ago*

    Jill Stein and the Green Party don’t run in Democratic primaries because they aren’t Democrats. They're an independent party with fundamentally different positions, like rejecting corporate donations, opposing U.S. imperialism, and pushing for ecological socialism. Entering a Democratic primary would mean compromising those values and legitimizing a party structure they believe is corrupt and undemocratic.

    As for non-battleground states, Stein does run in all 50 states, including so-called safe ones. But focusing only on those would write off millions of voters who live in swing states and want more than two options. It’s not the Green Party’s job to preserve the illusion of choice between two corporate-funded candidates. It’s the major parties’ job to earn votes.

    And they do run down-ballot candidates. The Green Party has had hundreds of local officeholders over the years: school boards, city councils, water districts, etc. In 2022 alone, Greens ran over 100 candidates nationwide. Just because CNN doesn’t cover them doesn’t mean they aren’t doing the work.

    The spoiler argument assumes votes belong to the Democrats by default. They don’t. People don’t owe their votes to anyone. If major parties want those votes, they should represent those voters—not just expect obedience.

    If every single person who voted third party would have instead voted for Harris, Trump still would have won. Harris didn't lose because of the Green Party, or any other third party. More people didn't vote than who voted third party. So how is that in anyway a spoiler?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Jill Stein needs to read the Rubles on the wall and get packing.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You still mad? She wasn't the reason you all lost the election! lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Whether she was or wasn't (I made no argument either way, you feeling defensive?), she is a lousy candidate that emerges like Punxsutawney Phil, only once every 4 years to do whatever the Kremlin tells her to do. She's a willing asset and the Greens either can't or won't see that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago

    Not defensive, but I thought that's why you weirdly referring to rubles. Why would she worry about rubles? She's talking about how much a 2-party system sucks in the US. Which does suck by the way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What's with the post title? It's not the title of the article nor does it reflect the article's content.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment