▲ -1 ▼ Anthropic says it can read Claude's 'thoughts,' as detailed in new research paper — models observed to have a global workspace, revealing more of what makes LLMs tick (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 4 months ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/Aii@programming.dev 6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 11 points 4 months ago (4 children) LLMs do not think permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) Hence the quotes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 point 4 months ago Anthropomorphism is a problem, even with quotes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -4 points 4 months ago* (1 child) There is no even agreed upon definition for what "thinking" means. Parroting these anti-AI one-liners isn't productive and doesn't make you look smart. LLMs and human brains are both systems capable of processing information. Most reasonable people would count that as "thinking" in everyday conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 point 4 months ago Anthropomorphising LLMs by saying they think and saying an LLM works in a similar way to the human brain shows how much you know about "AI" This is just tech oligarch propaganda designed to sell stocks and make it seem like "AGI" is possible via LLMs which it is not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) Hence the quotes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 point 4 months ago Anthropomorphism is a problem, even with quotes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 point 4 months ago Anthropomorphism is a problem, even with quotes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -4 points 4 months ago* (1 child) There is no even agreed upon definition for what "thinking" means. Parroting these anti-AI one-liners isn't productive and doesn't make you look smart. LLMs and human brains are both systems capable of processing information. Most reasonable people would count that as "thinking" in everyday conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 point 4 months ago Anthropomorphising LLMs by saying they think and saying an LLM works in a similar way to the human brain shows how much you know about "AI" This is just tech oligarch propaganda designed to sell stocks and make it seem like "AGI" is possible via LLMs which it is not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 point 4 months ago Anthropomorphising LLMs by saying they think and saying an LLM works in a similar way to the human brain shows how much you know about "AI" This is just tech oligarch propaganda designed to sell stocks and make it seem like "AGI" is possible via LLMs which it is not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Marija_@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago Understanding model behavior seems more valuable than chasing bigger benchmarks. permalink fedilink source
all 6 comments