you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 82 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Basically the rules are, you can't be in a fight already if you want to join.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Which makes a lot of sense. If you could wait until you need backup to join, you'd just never join until you need it. No country wants to get sucked into someone else's war.

    At least, that's the mentality. The truth is, no war is "someone else's war". We're all in this together globally, and oppression anywhere is a threat to everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Who knows, maybe NATO'll update to the modern era after this. Maybe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's a race to the salted Earth bottom, for sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • I think Trump is going to rumble about withdrawing, but I doubt it would actually happen. The US wants to be able to swat down any membership applications that they don’t like. That whole “unanimous decision” thing means the US can stonewall potential new members if they want, the same way Hungary has done for Sweden.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    There is no such rule. The rule is everyone else already in has to agree to you joining. Practically most people don't want to go to war and so nobody will agree, but there is no rule stating they can't agree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments