Despite the rush to integrate powerful new models, about 5% of AI pilot programs achieve rapid revenue acceleration; the vast majority stall, delivering little to no measurable impact on P&L.

The research—based on 150 interviews with leaders, a survey of 350 employees, and an analysis of 300 public AI deployments—paints a clear divide between success stories and stalled projects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 47 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Wait, we have AI flying planes now?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Conversely, AI running ATC would be a very good thing. To a point.

    It's been technically feasible for a while to handle 99% of what an ATC does automatically. The problem is that you really want a human to step in on those 1% of situations where things get complicated and really dangerous. Except, the human won't have their skills sharpened through constant use unless they're handling at least some of the regular traffic.

    Trick has been to have the AI do, say, 70% of the job, but having a human step in sometimes. Deciding on when to have a human step in is the hard problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    what do you think an autopilot is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments