▲ 471 ▼ VPN company Mullvad reminds users it will no longer use OpenVPN (mullvad.net) submitted 1 year ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) Try openwrt, ddwrt is cancer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) What? Why? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I used to use ddwrt until I didn't have a router (forced by cablemodem that I couldn't modify) But then I got fiber with a bridge and discovered OpenWRT and it was so incredible. So much more capable and such a better more competent community. Much more competent and ethical leadership that doesn't violate the GPL. How it works, just made more sense to me, there are so many feature I never want to lack in a router and frankly I wish I had in every linux distro. One of my absolute favorite thing about it, is that anything you click in the web interface, is a command run in the underlying system. Here I am setting a DHCP tag, which makes it so that all computers with a certain MAC address will receive a non-routing gateway, cutting them off from the internet. I use this to stop my TVs and VMs from connecting to the internet without having to deal with a bunch of static IP addresses and that whole firewall tedium. Notice how it's giving me the exact commands And the WebUI shows you all the commands before they run it. Not only that makes understanding how the system works underneath. It makes it very easy to reproduce all the same configuration using bunch of commands you can paste from a text file ! Recently I wanted to turn older such routers into dumb wifi access points and they were all mostly the same, so I just flashed them and then ran a series of commands that I learned from the Web UI, with just some things tweaked for each device. For me that feature alone makes the difference, but also the sketchiness of ddwrt with regards I think ddwrt gets love because ANYTHING is better than the awful, unreliable stock and locked down web user interfaces on routers. But between ddwrt and openwrt, I think it is no-contest, openwrt is the best choice between those two. Here is a bunch of articles more about this https://wi-fiplanet.com/the-dd-wrt-controversy/ https://hackaday.com/2011/09/21/modifying-dd-wrts-protected-gui/ https://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/12/06/anatomy-gpl-violation.html https://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/fresh-tomato-vs-openwrt-vs-dd-wrt.76178/ https://old.reddit.com/r/openwrt/comments/ld05u6/whats_the_difference_openwrt_ddwrt_tomato_opensan/ https://old.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/9hk0lm/is_ddwrt_no_longer_recommendedgeneral_opinions_on/ https://www.raspberrypibox.com/dd-wrt-vs-openwrt/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8060911 https://old.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/j5u3kf/why_is_ddwrt_such_a_pain/ https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3skn25/fcc_we_will_not_ban_ddwrt_on_wifi_routers/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago Huh. Alright, that's pretty convincing. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Magister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) can't with broadcom permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago I hear you, I also have broadcom ewaste, a Trident 2+ switch running open switch and I can never upgrade the debian 9 OS running kernel 4.9. I had to create a QEMU VM, put proxmox on it and put openwrt into an LXC in that to make it work. Our technology landscape is completely ducked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) What? Why? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I used to use ddwrt until I didn't have a router (forced by cablemodem that I couldn't modify) But then I got fiber with a bridge and discovered OpenWRT and it was so incredible. So much more capable and such a better more competent community. Much more competent and ethical leadership that doesn't violate the GPL. How it works, just made more sense to me, there are so many feature I never want to lack in a router and frankly I wish I had in every linux distro. One of my absolute favorite thing about it, is that anything you click in the web interface, is a command run in the underlying system. Here I am setting a DHCP tag, which makes it so that all computers with a certain MAC address will receive a non-routing gateway, cutting them off from the internet. I use this to stop my TVs and VMs from connecting to the internet without having to deal with a bunch of static IP addresses and that whole firewall tedium. Notice how it's giving me the exact commands And the WebUI shows you all the commands before they run it. Not only that makes understanding how the system works underneath. It makes it very easy to reproduce all the same configuration using bunch of commands you can paste from a text file ! Recently I wanted to turn older such routers into dumb wifi access points and they were all mostly the same, so I just flashed them and then ran a series of commands that I learned from the Web UI, with just some things tweaked for each device. For me that feature alone makes the difference, but also the sketchiness of ddwrt with regards I think ddwrt gets love because ANYTHING is better than the awful, unreliable stock and locked down web user interfaces on routers. But between ddwrt and openwrt, I think it is no-contest, openwrt is the best choice between those two. Here is a bunch of articles more about this https://wi-fiplanet.com/the-dd-wrt-controversy/ https://hackaday.com/2011/09/21/modifying-dd-wrts-protected-gui/ https://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/12/06/anatomy-gpl-violation.html https://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/fresh-tomato-vs-openwrt-vs-dd-wrt.76178/ https://old.reddit.com/r/openwrt/comments/ld05u6/whats_the_difference_openwrt_ddwrt_tomato_opensan/ https://old.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/9hk0lm/is_ddwrt_no_longer_recommendedgeneral_opinions_on/ https://www.raspberrypibox.com/dd-wrt-vs-openwrt/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8060911 https://old.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/j5u3kf/why_is_ddwrt_such_a_pain/ https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3skn25/fcc_we_will_not_ban_ddwrt_on_wifi_routers/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago Huh. Alright, that's pretty convincing. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I used to use ddwrt until I didn't have a router (forced by cablemodem that I couldn't modify) But then I got fiber with a bridge and discovered OpenWRT and it was so incredible. So much more capable and such a better more competent community. Much more competent and ethical leadership that doesn't violate the GPL. How it works, just made more sense to me, there are so many feature I never want to lack in a router and frankly I wish I had in every linux distro. One of my absolute favorite thing about it, is that anything you click in the web interface, is a command run in the underlying system. Here I am setting a DHCP tag, which makes it so that all computers with a certain MAC address will receive a non-routing gateway, cutting them off from the internet. I use this to stop my TVs and VMs from connecting to the internet without having to deal with a bunch of static IP addresses and that whole firewall tedium. Notice how it's giving me the exact commands And the WebUI shows you all the commands before they run it. Not only that makes understanding how the system works underneath. It makes it very easy to reproduce all the same configuration using bunch of commands you can paste from a text file ! Recently I wanted to turn older such routers into dumb wifi access points and they were all mostly the same, so I just flashed them and then ran a series of commands that I learned from the Web UI, with just some things tweaked for each device. For me that feature alone makes the difference, but also the sketchiness of ddwrt with regards I think ddwrt gets love because ANYTHING is better than the awful, unreliable stock and locked down web user interfaces on routers. But between ddwrt and openwrt, I think it is no-contest, openwrt is the best choice between those two. Here is a bunch of articles more about this https://wi-fiplanet.com/the-dd-wrt-controversy/ https://hackaday.com/2011/09/21/modifying-dd-wrts-protected-gui/ https://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/12/06/anatomy-gpl-violation.html https://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/fresh-tomato-vs-openwrt-vs-dd-wrt.76178/ https://old.reddit.com/r/openwrt/comments/ld05u6/whats_the_difference_openwrt_ddwrt_tomato_opensan/ https://old.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/9hk0lm/is_ddwrt_no_longer_recommendedgeneral_opinions_on/ https://www.raspberrypibox.com/dd-wrt-vs-openwrt/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8060911 https://old.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/j5u3kf/why_is_ddwrt_such_a_pain/ https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3skn25/fcc_we_will_not_ban_ddwrt_on_wifi_routers/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago Huh. Alright, that's pretty convincing. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago Huh. Alright, that's pretty convincing. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Magister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) can't with broadcom permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago I hear you, I also have broadcom ewaste, a Trident 2+ switch running open switch and I can never upgrade the debian 9 OS running kernel 4.9. I had to create a QEMU VM, put proxmox on it and put openwrt into an LXC in that to make it work. Our technology landscape is completely ducked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago I hear you, I also have broadcom ewaste, a Trident 2+ switch running open switch and I can never upgrade the debian 9 OS running kernel 4.9. I had to create a QEMU VM, put proxmox on it and put openwrt into an LXC in that to make it work. Our technology landscape is completely ducked. permalink fedilink source parent