▲ 493 ▼ AI experts return from China stunned: The U.S. grid is so weak, the race may already be over (fortune.com) submitted 1 year ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) We need less people No we don't. And, S. Korea in particular will need more people than they have available, soon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children) They don't NEED more people, nowhere on earth NEEDS more people, as long as you have as few as 12 genetically distinct individuals then life will continue, and even if they did NEED people then theres lots of people all over the world who would love to migrate to SK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Global warming is independent of population, emissions can be controlled without population controls. Yes, they do need more people, and immigration is a possible "solve", but right now they aren't getting the immigration necessary -- tho largely due to their own policies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Global Warming is NOT independent of population. The population growth almost perfectly aligns with climate change, and the top polluters on the planet are China despite having one of the lowest pollution per capita ratios. More humans = more environmental destruction permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children) They don't NEED more people, nowhere on earth NEEDS more people, as long as you have as few as 12 genetically distinct individuals then life will continue, and even if they did NEED people then theres lots of people all over the world who would love to migrate to SK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Global warming is independent of population, emissions can be controlled without population controls. Yes, they do need more people, and immigration is a possible "solve", but right now they aren't getting the immigration necessary -- tho largely due to their own policies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Global Warming is NOT independent of population. The population growth almost perfectly aligns with climate change, and the top polluters on the planet are China despite having one of the lowest pollution per capita ratios. More humans = more environmental destruction permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Global warming is independent of population, emissions can be controlled without population controls. Yes, they do need more people, and immigration is a possible "solve", but right now they aren't getting the immigration necessary -- tho largely due to their own policies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Global Warming is NOT independent of population. The population growth almost perfectly aligns with climate change, and the top polluters on the planet are China despite having one of the lowest pollution per capita ratios. More humans = more environmental destruction permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Global Warming is NOT independent of population. The population growth almost perfectly aligns with climate change, and the top polluters on the planet are China despite having one of the lowest pollution per capita ratios. More humans = more environmental destruction permalink fedilink source parent