you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 294 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Obviously it's higher. If it was any lower, they would've made a huge announcement out of it to prove they're better than the competition.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    I’m thinking otherwise. I think GPT5 is a much smaller model - with some fallback to previous models if required.

    Since it’s running on the exact same hardware with a mostly similar algorithm, using less energy would directly mean it’s a “less intense” model, which translates into an inferior quality in American Investor Language (AIL).

    And 2025’s investors doesn’t give a flying fuck about energy efficiency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    They probably wouldn't really care how efficient it is, but they certainly would care that the costs are lower.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I’m almost sure they’re keeping that for the Earnings call.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And they don't want to disclose the energy efficiency becaaaause ... ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's cheaper though, so very likely it's more efficient somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments