▲ 147 ▼ Intel collapsing? (lemmy.relayeasy.com) submitted 1 year ago by 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 31 comments fedilink hide all child comments Starting to see a lot of worried people as Intel descends downwards rapidly. Reminds me of Nokia how this is going... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXVQVbAFh6I
[–] romanticremedy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) We need more competition in HW space tho permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) True. Hopefully Intel can work things out, but I don't think this strategy is it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com [S] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Losing cash hand over fist and basically screwing everyone over certainly isn't the way to do it... Having the main product you have been known for for like ever being so poor isn't it either permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago Investing money to catch up is the way to do it. The CEO before Gelsinger didn't invest in R&D, which is why they fell behind in the first place. When you're behind, you either need to spend crazy amounts of money to catch up, or sell off the fabs and become a design only firm, but they decided to take the government handouts and keep the fabs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) True. Hopefully Intel can work things out, but I don't think this strategy is it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com [S] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Losing cash hand over fist and basically screwing everyone over certainly isn't the way to do it... Having the main product you have been known for for like ever being so poor isn't it either permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago Investing money to catch up is the way to do it. The CEO before Gelsinger didn't invest in R&D, which is why they fell behind in the first place. When you're behind, you either need to spend crazy amounts of money to catch up, or sell off the fabs and become a design only firm, but they decided to take the government handouts and keep the fabs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com [S] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Losing cash hand over fist and basically screwing everyone over certainly isn't the way to do it... Having the main product you have been known for for like ever being so poor isn't it either permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago Investing money to catch up is the way to do it. The CEO before Gelsinger didn't invest in R&D, which is why they fell behind in the first place. When you're behind, you either need to spend crazy amounts of money to catch up, or sell off the fabs and become a design only firm, but they decided to take the government handouts and keep the fabs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago Investing money to catch up is the way to do it. The CEO before Gelsinger didn't invest in R&D, which is why they fell behind in the first place. When you're behind, you either need to spend crazy amounts of money to catch up, or sell off the fabs and become a design only firm, but they decided to take the government handouts and keep the fabs. permalink fedilink source parent