▲ 240 ▼ Why don't smart watches use USB-C to recharge? (shkspr.mobi) submitted 1 year ago by mesamunefire@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 123 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (5 children) Not conductive? Isn’t that a good thing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol, conducive was the word they were going for permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I know. :-) permalink fedilink source parent [–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) For a charging port? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago For filth in a charging port, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent [–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I like you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol, conducive was the word they were going for permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I know. :-) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) For a charging port? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago For filth in a charging port, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago For filth in a charging port, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent