▲ 522 ▼ DO NOT TOUCH (programming.dev) submitted 1 year ago by irelephant@programming.dev to c/iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev 45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 year ago* (8 children) 90% of internet in the 90s was hosted like this. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] btr_fan87@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (7 children) It feels like a loss that this is no longer the case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (6 children) It absolutely is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago (5 children) And its mostly the fault of ISPs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SnugZebras@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) What did ISPs change? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) They stopped giving people static IP addresses by default, which makes at home self hosting too hard for normies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago Pretty sure normies don't even know what an IP address is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] why_not_start_over@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Wasn't really static IP, but upload caps and bandwidth limits. And "updated Terms of Service." To your point, they started charging for static IPs or just not offering them for "home" service. In the early days (feeling old yet), self hosting wasn't shut down so much as shared hosting from home. People were running shared web and email hosts from home and ISPs didn't like that added cost and competition, mostly cost. Bandwidth was expensive going over copper exchanges. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago They never gave people static IPs by default in general. Done did if you were lucky but most didn't. (In the UK at least.) Hence the existence of things like dyndns. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] btr_fan87@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (7 children) It feels like a loss that this is no longer the case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (6 children) It absolutely is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago (5 children) And its mostly the fault of ISPs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SnugZebras@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) What did ISPs change? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) They stopped giving people static IP addresses by default, which makes at home self hosting too hard for normies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago Pretty sure normies don't even know what an IP address is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] why_not_start_over@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Wasn't really static IP, but upload caps and bandwidth limits. And "updated Terms of Service." To your point, they started charging for static IPs or just not offering them for "home" service. In the early days (feeling old yet), self hosting wasn't shut down so much as shared hosting from home. People were running shared web and email hosts from home and ISPs didn't like that added cost and competition, mostly cost. Bandwidth was expensive going over copper exchanges. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago They never gave people static IPs by default in general. Done did if you were lucky but most didn't. (In the UK at least.) Hence the existence of things like dyndns. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (6 children) It absolutely is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago (5 children) And its mostly the fault of ISPs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SnugZebras@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) What did ISPs change? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) They stopped giving people static IP addresses by default, which makes at home self hosting too hard for normies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago Pretty sure normies don't even know what an IP address is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] why_not_start_over@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Wasn't really static IP, but upload caps and bandwidth limits. And "updated Terms of Service." To your point, they started charging for static IPs or just not offering them for "home" service. In the early days (feeling old yet), self hosting wasn't shut down so much as shared hosting from home. People were running shared web and email hosts from home and ISPs didn't like that added cost and competition, mostly cost. Bandwidth was expensive going over copper exchanges. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago They never gave people static IPs by default in general. Done did if you were lucky but most didn't. (In the UK at least.) Hence the existence of things like dyndns. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago (5 children) And its mostly the fault of ISPs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SnugZebras@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) What did ISPs change? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) They stopped giving people static IP addresses by default, which makes at home self hosting too hard for normies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago Pretty sure normies don't even know what an IP address is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] why_not_start_over@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Wasn't really static IP, but upload caps and bandwidth limits. And "updated Terms of Service." To your point, they started charging for static IPs or just not offering them for "home" service. In the early days (feeling old yet), self hosting wasn't shut down so much as shared hosting from home. People were running shared web and email hosts from home and ISPs didn't like that added cost and competition, mostly cost. Bandwidth was expensive going over copper exchanges. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago They never gave people static IPs by default in general. Done did if you were lucky but most didn't. (In the UK at least.) Hence the existence of things like dyndns. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnugZebras@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) What did ISPs change? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) They stopped giving people static IP addresses by default, which makes at home self hosting too hard for normies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago Pretty sure normies don't even know what an IP address is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] why_not_start_over@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Wasn't really static IP, but upload caps and bandwidth limits. And "updated Terms of Service." To your point, they started charging for static IPs or just not offering them for "home" service. In the early days (feeling old yet), self hosting wasn't shut down so much as shared hosting from home. People were running shared web and email hosts from home and ISPs didn't like that added cost and competition, mostly cost. Bandwidth was expensive going over copper exchanges. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago They never gave people static IPs by default in general. Done did if you were lucky but most didn't. (In the UK at least.) Hence the existence of things like dyndns. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) They stopped giving people static IP addresses by default, which makes at home self hosting too hard for normies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago Pretty sure normies don't even know what an IP address is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] why_not_start_over@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Wasn't really static IP, but upload caps and bandwidth limits. And "updated Terms of Service." To your point, they started charging for static IPs or just not offering them for "home" service. In the early days (feeling old yet), self hosting wasn't shut down so much as shared hosting from home. People were running shared web and email hosts from home and ISPs didn't like that added cost and competition, mostly cost. Bandwidth was expensive going over copper exchanges. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago They never gave people static IPs by default in general. Done did if you were lucky but most didn't. (In the UK at least.) Hence the existence of things like dyndns. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago Pretty sure normies don't even know what an IP address is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] why_not_start_over@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Wasn't really static IP, but upload caps and bandwidth limits. And "updated Terms of Service." To your point, they started charging for static IPs or just not offering them for "home" service. In the early days (feeling old yet), self hosting wasn't shut down so much as shared hosting from home. People were running shared web and email hosts from home and ISPs didn't like that added cost and competition, mostly cost. Bandwidth was expensive going over copper exchanges. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago They never gave people static IPs by default in general. Done did if you were lucky but most didn't. (In the UK at least.) Hence the existence of things like dyndns. permalink fedilink source parent