you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    That's why they need to change the law in order to ban it. Duh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The classic slippery slope, thin end of the wedge argument.

    A reasonable position, you're gonna need some evidence of intention or history to give it some heft though.

    Anything claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments