▲ 170 ▼ Uber Eats is adding AI to menus, food photos, and reviews (www.theverge.com) submitted 1 year ago by kebab@endlesstalk.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 year ago (5 children) I mean, the US has similar laws too. It just doesnt matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] IllNess@infosec.pub 24 points 1 year ago (4 children) I did more research and you are correct. 15 U.S. Code § 52 - Dissemination of false advertisements - (a) Unlawfulness - It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or corporation to disseminate, or cause to be disseminated, any false advertisement—. Source:law.cornel.edu Okay. Good. The term “false advertisement” means an advertisement, other than labeling, which is misleading in a material respect; and in determining whether any advertisement is misleading, there shall be taken into account (among other things) not only representations made or suggested by statement, word, design, device, sound, or any combination thereof, but also the extent to which the advertisement fails to reveal facts material in the light of such representations or material with respect to consequences which may result from the use of the commodity to which the advertisement relates under the conditions prescribed in said advertisement, or under such conditions as are customary or usual. Source:law.cornel.edu Good. Good. if such violation is with intent to defraud or mislead, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment; Source:law.cornel.edu No! No! No! So a corporation can just pay $5,000 and throw a designer, who was only following directions, under a bus?! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children) Fees should be based on revenue and scale up on repeat offenses. Otherwise it's just "the cost of doing business" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IllNess@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago And this is how it should be with all monetary punishments. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that's $5000 in 1994 money (if not older). Surely fines should scale with inflation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago True but revenue/income hurts a lot more. Corps only listen to the bottom line. Both Nvidia and Intel and knowingly broken the law and just paid the fine while profits covered the loss. The system is broken. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 24 points 1 year ago (4 children) I did more research and you are correct. 15 U.S. Code § 52 - Dissemination of false advertisements - (a) Unlawfulness - It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or corporation to disseminate, or cause to be disseminated, any false advertisement—. Source:law.cornel.edu Okay. Good. The term “false advertisement” means an advertisement, other than labeling, which is misleading in a material respect; and in determining whether any advertisement is misleading, there shall be taken into account (among other things) not only representations made or suggested by statement, word, design, device, sound, or any combination thereof, but also the extent to which the advertisement fails to reveal facts material in the light of such representations or material with respect to consequences which may result from the use of the commodity to which the advertisement relates under the conditions prescribed in said advertisement, or under such conditions as are customary or usual. Source:law.cornel.edu Good. Good. if such violation is with intent to defraud or mislead, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment; Source:law.cornel.edu No! No! No! So a corporation can just pay $5,000 and throw a designer, who was only following directions, under a bus?! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children) Fees should be based on revenue and scale up on repeat offenses. Otherwise it's just "the cost of doing business" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IllNess@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago And this is how it should be with all monetary punishments. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that's $5000 in 1994 money (if not older). Surely fines should scale with inflation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago True but revenue/income hurts a lot more. Corps only listen to the bottom line. Both Nvidia and Intel and knowingly broken the law and just paid the fine while profits covered the loss. The system is broken. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children) Fees should be based on revenue and scale up on repeat offenses. Otherwise it's just "the cost of doing business" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IllNess@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago And this is how it should be with all monetary punishments. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that's $5000 in 1994 money (if not older). Surely fines should scale with inflation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago True but revenue/income hurts a lot more. Corps only listen to the bottom line. Both Nvidia and Intel and knowingly broken the law and just paid the fine while profits covered the loss. The system is broken. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago And this is how it should be with all monetary punishments. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that's $5000 in 1994 money (if not older). Surely fines should scale with inflation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago True but revenue/income hurts a lot more. Corps only listen to the bottom line. Both Nvidia and Intel and knowingly broken the law and just paid the fine while profits covered the loss. The system is broken. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago True but revenue/income hurts a lot more. Corps only listen to the bottom line. Both Nvidia and Intel and knowingly broken the law and just paid the fine while profits covered the loss. The system is broken. permalink fedilink source parent