The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

Oh I see. You're accusing me of not reading it when I'm simply not convinced.

Welp Pam bondi saying "there's always a missing minute" doesn't really factor when the video is spliced together and demonstrably so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    They are accusing you of not reading the article OP posted, or even the two sentence summary OP included in their post body.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Oh well I did. Sounds like you guys didn't really apply any critical thinking to what you read though.

    Pam Bondi: "Trust me bro"

    Me: "Lmao no"

    You: "RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments