you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

To start taking users away from Facebook, it needs to be sufficiently better than them to overcome their network effects. Which are substantial. Some of the features that I'd count as "better" would be laughable coming from Google:

  • more social, less monetised for ads
  • not sending traffic to fascist tech bros
  • just show me my friends' updates, don't fuck around with them with an algorithm
  • I want my "work network", "social network" and "email" to be from different companies, so none know too much about me

In addition:

  • actually advertise what's better about them, so people will move. "Circles" was the most confusing shit I'd ever seen

  • some of the prioritisation in FB was exactly backwards for me; I want to see more distant friends' updates more often, since I see my local friends to keep up with them. I want to see friends that post less often prioritised over attention seekers that post every time they fart. That might be "algorithm" tho; feed you tidbits to keep you scrolling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    To start taking users away from VK, only a country-wide ban at ISP level worked. Surprisingly effectively. Few bothered with VPNs. Most switched to Facebook and/or Telegram, depending on who wanted more feed or chat features.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
    • I want my "work network", "social network" and "email" to be from different companies, so none know too much about me

    I want a publicly maintained social network, designed on similar principles to blockchain somehow. I don’t want any company having control over my social network, nor any tyrannical individual.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments