i mean, the liberals i know get into heated debates over SUVs, walkability, urbanism and density every two months. so i would fully and strongly agree that is the stronger position, but i would disagree that is the liberal position. and again, i don't see how this proposal involves building highways

They usually build sprawl, and this is “easy”.

it is easy to forget that people naturally built neighborhoods and centralized into cities. it took meticulous planning and an atrocious trove of funds—e.g. the GI Bill, Robert Moses redlining, and the 40-year effort that culminated in the Interstate system that then took another 30 years to build—to artificially sprawl.

urbanists have for a very long time pointed to single-family zoning as the major cause of all this sprawl and all this housing crisis, a housing restriction that needs to go. i am an urbanist and i agree. just ask !fuckcars.

i also feel like all the other proposals are very much liberal priorities (with the exception that Medicare for Kids is somewhat unrelated while Medicare for All is, but that is the point of that section)