In 1958, French paediatrician Marthe Gautier helped produce the laboratory evidence linking Down's syndrome to an extra chromosome at the Armand-Trousseau children's hospital in Paris.

Her contribution became the subject of a long-running dispute after Jérôme Lejeune emerged as the best-known figure associated with the discovery, while a 2014 assessment by France's medical research institute stressed Gautier and department head Raymond Turpin's indispensable roles.

In 1956, researchers established that human cells normally contain 46 chromosomes, prompting Turpin to investigate a chromosomal cause for Down's syndrome.

Gautier had learned cell-culture techniques during a scholarship at Harvard in 1955 and brought that expertise back to Paris.

Gautier developed a method for growing cells from children with the condition, using rooster plasma and her own blood serum.

The preparations made it possible to examine chromosomes, although the laboratory lacked equipment to photograph the smallest structures clearly.

Who first counted 47 chromosomes remains contested. Gautier's 2009 account described her role in preparing and examining the cells, while Lejeune's laboratory notebook, cited by his foundation, records a 47-chromosome observation in a child with Down's syndrome on 22 May 1958. A second entry on 13 June referred to a different condition.

The foundation also points to a letter Turpin sent Lejeune on 27 October 1958, saying Gautier and another researcher, Mrs Massé, were still obtaining counts of 46.

Although the notebook evidence challenges the claim that Gautier alone made the first count, it does not diminish her role in developing the cell-culture method.

Lejeune presented the finding at McGill University in 1958, before the research was published in January 1959, listing him first, Gautier second and Turpin last, with Gautier's surname misspelled as 'Gauthier'; a second communication followed in March.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 1 day ago (7 children)

IIRC Watson & Crick did the same thing; a female colleague made the discovery, but they took the credit.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    Same for Emily Noether, who frankly deserves at least as much fame as Einstein for unifying deep concepts.

    And for Henrietta Leavitt, who actually discovered the expansion of the universe and told Hubble about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    That was Rosalind Franklin. There are many women througout history that were skipped or even excluded from nobel-prize nominations.It's a dark stain on the science community. It even has a name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matilda_effect

    I recently listened to a podcast about Jocelyn Brunel, who got excluded for the nobel prize because she was "just a student" and a woman. She discovered pulsars. Her colleagues called it the "no-brunell prize" after that. She won a large prize recently and donated it all to the advacement of women in science.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Not exactly.

    Photo 51 was taken by Raymond Gosling.

    Gosling was a PhD student working under Rosalind Franklin at King’s College London.

    So it depends on how you define who gets credit when the advancement was the result of thousands of people working together for decades.

  • source
  • parent