That's what people doing. That's the reason they're talking at chatbots, because chatbots mimics speech. They do "chatbot, explain X to me", chatbot generates words that look like a text full of whatever, user skims those words, sometimes doing "I don't understand Y part of it, explain it again but using different words", and go "oh, I understand X now, chatbot called me a good boy in the end, this means I'm an expert on X actually", and go about their days thinking they know shit now, when in reality they did unlearning.
I'm sure you're different, but if so you're unique. And maybe, just maybe, you also don't realise how not unique you are.
It's hard to overestimate how effective an llm is at making people believe they weren't lied to

Perhaps if you’re building upon 15 years of knowledge and have good judgement about what to believe they could potentially be decent for self-learning, but i don’t see how that would be any easier than just doing self-teaching the old fashioned way.

If someone is starting with 0 years of knowledge, I seriously doubt an LLM would be beneficial in any way.

There are studies about the phenomenon of people not learning as much when acquiring the information becomes too frictionless (i.e. “what’s the point of knowing something when I could just ask the computer”).

I am adept at self-learning, and I would never utilize such a tool in my studies. I also don’t see any need to augment my self-teaching process, as it is already extremely easy, and I am already good at it; I don’t need assistance from software that is incapable of thought (critical or otherwise), and doesn’t “know” anything.