The U.S. war with Iran has raised fossil fuel prices so much that the resulting drop in oil demand has put the world on track to see a rare dip in carbon emissions from these sources in 2026.

Between 2019 and 2025, carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels grew by about 0.8 percent annually, according to a new study published in Nature Climate Change. But 2026 is set to buck that trend: high oil prices, as well as the continued rise of green technology—solar power, wind and electric cars—will cause a “short-term” 0.4 percent drop, according to the study.

“The high petrol prices following the war in Iran are reducing oil use and keeping emissions low,” says the study’s lead author Corinne Le Quéré, a professor of climate change science at the University of East Anglia in England. “But that’s not the whole story: The expansion of renewable energy has progressed a lot in recent years, led by China. And [along with electric vehicles], this is offsetting two thirds of the growing demand for energy.”

With all sources of carbon considered, including deforestation, total global CO2 emissions are set to continue increasing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 61 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (32 children)

Dont forget demand destruction, I finally bought an electric car this year after years of putting it off. Since the oil companies jacked up their prices in response to a war for which they supported the very candidate who caused it, I said enough is enough. Hopefully I will never buy gas again in my life.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago (11 children)

    Technology connections pitches electric cars I think in the way that speaks to many more people than the usual environment pitch. Basically " wouldn't you want energy independence?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    I'm actually surprised he didn't bring up how the regular maintenance on an EV is non-existent; it's a lot less hassle. There's no regular oil changes, for example. Even your brakes can last longer if you're good at single-pedal mode.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    If you work with any kind of machinery the reliability of modern ice vehicles is crazy good. People treat them like shit often and they still go. Lots of other machinery has maintenance schedules in single digit hours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago

    can confirm. my vehicle is a piece of shit because I didn't bother undercoating it, I drive it hard at times, I ignore CELs, I put off maintenance, etc

    still running. mostly figured out that the idle and not starting after fueling issues I've been having was related to PCV valve and throttle body, but the exhaust still has lots of holes, the fuel tank will start leaking soon, and the suspension is entirely worn out (ok that one is just age)

    and yet it keeps running

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    I think we need to be careful about pushing this. In concept there is less maintenance, more reliability, but it comes down to quality and engineering.

    Legacy technology has very mature engineering where they’ve done really well with cars that keep running despite everything. EV technology is less mature and legacy companies are still struggling to transition to new concepts and practices. It hasn’t always been smooth and any race to cheaper prices will not help

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Its a little depressing that it's the only argument that has a chance on most people. Killing millions? Don't care. Saving a bit of money? Ohh yeah!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 18 hours ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

    If I could be dictator for a day, climate change would be solved and so many would hate me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    Huh. Mostly just the consumerists and authoritarians who ended up hating me. The poorer parts of the world became more prosperous too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    I can usually assuage the consumerists by implementing champagne socialism, but the authoritarians (and usually the accelerationsists and Malthusians) never get along with me.

    But, depending which disasters hit and how quickly I have also been deposed several times, even once after restoring the climate to pre-industrial quality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago*

    Yeah, accelerationists and malthusians were not my fans either. I did champagne socialism but that didn't stop the consumerists becoming my nemesis first.

    Interestingly it took me longest to reduce temperature but biodiversity was improving very early on.

    Happiness was higher than I expected it to be and early game political capital was what held back my more extreme ideas like banning cars. People were mostly chill with it thanks to other things, I think massively improving the poorer countries meant globally at least people must have overall liked it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 23 hours ago (13 children)

    The sad thing is that, like everything, the only people who can escape the insane prices are the ones in a place privileged enough to be able to afford to. I live in an apartment building and even if I was on the first floor and my landlord was ok with me running an extension cord out my window, across the pathway, and to the parking lot (I'm not and they'd kill me) fairly often I have to park my car 2 buildings away and walk the equivalent of a block and a half to my apartment. I also can't come close to affording a new car, mine is from the early 2010s. I drive an hour to work and an hour to school in the opposite direction, and constantly driving 20 minutes to the nearest charging station isn't a viable option either (nor is public transportation or an e-bike, because of the distances I go every day).

    I'm all for electric and I'm glad you were able to make the switch, but a lot of us who can't afford the gas prices sure as hell can't afford to buy electric, because it's not just the car, it's the logistics. Until the infrastructure for electric becomes more common and apartment complexes put charging stations in (I'm sure some do, but I can't afford rent in those places) electric cars are a privilege for the rich and those who live in houses and have private parking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    Does your work or school not have charging points? If not, that's the classic supply-demand problem...

    Like, I don't have charging at home either, but I can drive several hours without charging. You possibly could too. Have you checked your stretches on something like A Better Routeplanner for example?

    Even if I was to use exclusively superfast charging, it'd still be cheaper than diesel. Unless you live in the middle of nowhere, and drive to the middle of nowhere, the charge-anxiety can often be exaggerated, or at least it was in my case.

    (I understand the real problem is an electric car might not be affordable enough for you, but I've become peeved about charge-anxiety)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago* (1 child)

    And yet even you

    • probably decide every year whether to continue living there
    • may have some influence with your landlord or your employer or where you run errands.

    Charging at home is certainly the cheapest most convenient option. A few landlords will support that (we used to have incentives). When your lease ends, looking for a charging option may modify your decision.

    But more and more places have destination charging. Some restaurants. Some parking garages. Some shopping centers. If I regularly went to the mall, it would be trivial to keep my vehicle charged. I also have free charging at work! But the point is to look around. There are options, more all the time, and at done point it may work for you

    Most landlords have no incentives to install chargers until people ask for it and make decisions on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    decide every year to continue living there

    My landlord is awesome, my apartment is nice, my rent is on the cheaper end and they barely raise it every year, and I quite literally can't afford to move right now.

    I don't go to restaurants (I can't afford it) and the nearest shopping centers with charging ports have the charger I was talking about that is 20 minutes away. We don't have parking garages here,I don't live in a city (nor do I want to).

    I'm not changing my entire life for a fucking car, and I couldn't even if I wanted to.

    You people make it so simple and think everyone who doesn't follow the party line is a traitor, but some of us don't have the means or privilege to do so and I just wanted to point that out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 18 hours ago (7 children)

    I know this might sound offcolor, but why even have a car at all at that point? Why not move to a supermajor city where you can bike/transit everywhere instead?

    I was in a very similar situation to you when I moved out of my parents’s house and above is similar to what I did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (6 children)

    Moving is extremely expensive. Besides passing for a truck and fuel, you pay first, last, and often an additional month's rent, if renting, plus utility deposits, but any deposit refunds usually lag a month. Assume you also are still working trying to get all this done, or aren't and on a fixed income.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago (5 children)

    It totally is expensive, but it’s cheaper than driving 2 hours a day for 2-4 years (insurance, maintenance, registration, gas). Besides that, the health of the matter is that driving that much is terrible for you physically.

    Cars have become this albatross across everyone’s neck in the US, and it makes me super sad that people don’t naturally try to get away from being chained to one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago (4 children)

    Okay but f the poor who can't and most need to do that. 🤷‍♀️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago* (3 children)

    It’s like I said, it is possible to save up money by extreme measures, considering that 2+hours of driving is already in that camp (especially as a student). The sad thing is that even with a bachelors degree, that’s not even enough to “solve” one’s financial problems in the short term. It took me 7 years after college to start to become financially independent. All I’m saying is that it’s generally easier to rip off the bandaid sooner and move to the city and just not have a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (2 children)

    What extreme measures? Selling drugs or oneself, stealing and fencing, robbery?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago* (1 child)

    Delivery apps, boiled chicken and rice meals twice a day, live in your car (or with family/roommate). Start networking early for jobs while in school. Sell everything you own. Have nothing but your laptop+phone and personal items.

    I’m not saying it’s the right thing to do always, and I’m not saying it’s morally right, but that’s what I did (save for living in a car; I didn’t have one). It really was painful at times, but it was the only way to save money when I was making 10$/hour.

    To be clear: I’m all for standard free public housing for the poor, but it just isn’t going to happen in rural America, let alone every major city.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 40 minutes ago

    I got you. I guess I was more thinking of people with medical conditions or older people, because there's a lot of that in my rural community. In fact, I don't know anyone of any age who doesn't need regular medical care.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    I hope that for you too. Luckily, I live near very good public trans, so for me, an e-scooter's really all I need.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    I mean we as a society have to ask, would we accept this level of insane fluctuation from anything else we buy? If you went to the store one day and bread was $2 bux a loaf, then you go again 3 days later and its $17, then a few days later is $9... Society would collectively say get your shit together on pricing! And we'd never buy bread again.

    Well now Im never buying gas again. And its their own fault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Fuel prices went up a lot but the price swings are still nowhere near the example prices you gave there...

    It went from 1,5 - 1,6 € per litre to about 2,5 € per litre here, not from 1,5 to 9. And the changes are happening, people are buying more electric cars and home batteries+solar is growing very rapidly... So no, people are not accepting it, despite the price increase still being manageable (and price still being rather steady, it basically just swung up quickly at the Iran fiasco and then plateau there)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago

    It's a nice thought, but presumably (based on geography) you might be able to live with lower gas consumption. At least here in the US, it's wholly possible that you only have one place to acquire groceries where you live.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    Well that's a double edged sword. There's so much fluctuation in part because it's such a ubiquitous commodity, availability is high and margins are low.

    If branding mattered more (like with groceries) then prices would be more stable (but higher).

    But as it is, nobody cares that much what brand of gas they get, it's just gas. A name brand can't demand a higher price just because it's a name brand, nobody cares.

    Society would collectively say get your shit together on pricing! And we'd never buy bread again.

    I mean, prices at the pump aren't fluctuating that much, but I do get your meaning. That said, in general people don't really have much of a choice when it comes to food, we have to eat. I mean, do you remember how eggs surged in price during the pandemic years? People still bought them, it just sucked. Oh we complained about it alright! But we as a society didn't do anything

  • source
  • parent