you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 17 hours ago (12 children)

Naaah. He got some of them for sure, but there’s still a fuck ton of those douchebags right here on lemmy. If only admins had the balls to do something about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 16 hours ago (9 children)

    Well, main developer of Lemmy once posted something like this:

    Who doesn’t support Russia - doesn’t understand geopolitics.

    So yeah, I switched to PieFed once figured out that its devs don’t want me dead from a russian missile for the crime of existing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (8 children)

    switched to PieFed

    Switched from commies that never had a chance of achieving anything politically, to the dev who had a user blocklist baked into the code.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago

    Well it called doing something. Good or bad depend on where you stand, but it's something nonetheless, not to mention it exists because of the tankie dev. So people that don't want to even encounter a tankie in the wild will feels like it's a good move, while people who like to play compromise with supremacist will think it's a bad thing, the rest probably doesn't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 13 hours ago (4 children)

    Except it does not though. Making a feature opt-in is literally the most friendly and permissive action that can be taken in such matters.

    Btw Lemmy v1.0 gives Lemmy.ml sole veto power in suggesting community names to new instance installations. But it too is not so much hard-coded as opt-out.

    Both platforms are rather opinionated, but the amount of disinformation targeted against PieFed is significantly higher.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

    Except it does not though.

    It was taken out by other devs after people made a stink about it. Which is a regular occurrence with Piefed, people having to fix what the main dev does. His entire development process is like someone's who's still in school.

    disinformation targeted against PieFed

    If only its source code were open and visible to everyone, so anyone could check if this 'disinformation' is true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    As far as I heard, all of the "hard-coded" accusations were disproven. Wrapping a statement inside an IF() block that is not executed unless the instance admin specifically requests it is not the same as hard-coding.

    Nor is Lemmy.ml's holding of the veto power for community suggestions quite hard-coded, although tbh its being opt-out is a bit closer to such than opt-in.

    Feel free to send a link to educate me. Every link I've previously read ended up being disproven. In return, please feel free to actually examine the sourcecode yourself - Rimu has previously sent links to the exact lines involved to make the process quicker.

    PieFed is opinionated software though, in other ways, that much is fair. As too is Lemmy, which offers numerous rights to admins and a bit less to mods but far, far less to mere users - like no modmail or other ability to ask a mod what happened; and while an instance admin can defederate from an instance, individual users have no ability to do so (e.g. users from that instance can still send you DMs, and troll you in communities not on their home instance). Fortunately both are FLOSS and we can look at the entirety of their respective sourcecode packages whenever we like, even make a fork if we would rather, as PyLova has done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    That was a different dev. You're thinking of the one who made his Lemmy frontend block users.

    Piefeds moderation features are open to modify.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

    No, I'm talking about Piefed. It also had a user blocklist. Until other devs noticed and went "what the fuck", which is the standard development procedure in that project.

  • source
  • parent