I hear you there. If I may offer a shift in perspective: linguistic change is inevitable, though it certainly doesn't help that the US insists on calling them "accents" vs "dialects" —presumably to pin up the illusion of underlying cultural unity across the country. Whereas, defining them accurately could play a part in their preservation, instead of insinuating they're inconsequential, dispensable, fleeting, etc. 🥲
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments